Louisiana’s Attorney General Won’t Charge Police Officers in the Death of Alton Sterling

Sterling’s shooting sparked nationwide protests in 2016.

A boy rides his bike in front of a mural of Alton Sterling in Baton Rogue, Louisiana.Gerald Herbert/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Two Baton Rouge police officers involved in the high-profile shooting death of Alton Sterling will not face criminal charges, Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry announced Tuesday morning. Landry said that officer Blane Salamoni acted lawfully when he shot the 37-year-old Sterling in July 2016 and that officer Howie Lake, who was also involved in the incident, acted appropriately, as well. The announcement comes amid growing national outrage over the police killing of an unarmed black man in his own backyard in Sacramento, California, earlier this month. In the Sacramento case, two officers shot at the man, Stephon Clark, 20 times after apparently mistaking his cell phone for a gun, police have said.

Sterling, who was black, was shot after police responded to a call about a man with a gun outside a store. Officers arrived and encountered Sterling, and a confrontation ensued in the store’s parking lot. Video of the incident showed one officer use a Taser on Sterling and another tackle him to the ground. Salamoni’s decision to shoot Sterling in the back when he was already on the ground—followed by the police shooting of Philando Castile in a Minneapolis suburb days later—sparked national outrage and a new wave of Black Lives Matter protests during the summer of 2016.

“After a thorough and exhaustive review of the evidence…the Louisiana Department of Justice cannot proceed with a prosecution of either officer Lake or officer Salamoni,” Landry said Tuesday. “We came to this conclusion after countless hours of reviewing the evidence gathered and turned over to us by the US Department of Justice, including voluminous documents, many photographs, extensive video evidence, and again, after our own interviews of eye witnesses to the event.”

“Our investigation has concluded that officers Lake and Salamoni attempted to make a lawful arrest of Alton Sterling based upon probable cause,” Landry added. “During that encounter, Mr. Sterling continued to resist the officers’ attempts to arrest him.” Landry noted that investigators had determined that Sterling was armed and that he had more than one drug in his system at the time of the encounter.

Louisiana state law enforcement officials opened an investigation into Sterling’s death last spring after the US Department of Justice announced in May 2017 that it did not have enough evidence for a federal prosecution of the officers involved in the shooting. That decision was announced after President Donald Trump’s attorney general, Jeff Sessions, had taken over the DOJ. Sessions has long been an opponent of criminal justice reform, but notably, much of the Sterling investigation had been concluded under President Barack Obama, whose DOJ also rarely charged officers in police shooting incidents.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate