June 20, 2018

Police Shootings, Critics Say, Are Another Way the Government Separates Families of Color

Antwon Rose, 17, was unarmed and fleeing when a Pennsylvania cop shot him down.

Antwon RoseNickole Nesby/Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Antwon Rose, an unarmed black teenager, was shot and killed by a police officer on Tuesday during a traffic stop in East Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. With critical stories about the Trump administration’s policy of forced family separation dominating the headlines, social media users were quick to cite Rose’s shooting as an example of yet another way the government separates children of color from their parents.

According to the Washington Post‘s database of fatal police shootings, nearly two-thirds of the people under the age of 18 who have been killed by police since 2015 were black or Hispanic. Officers have killed five people under the age of 18 so far this year—three were black, two white. In 2017, at least 19 of the 28 children killed by law enforcement were black or Hispanic, and in 2016, 10 of 16 were. The year before, it was 8 of 18.

Rose, 17, was shot and killed after he fled from a vehicle as officers handcuffed the driver. Police had been searching for a vehicle involved in an earlier shooting, according to a report by KDKA TV, the local CBS affiliate.

Officers spotted the vehicle Rose was riding in—which according to KDKA, contained bullet holes and fit the description of a car seen leaving the scene of the earlier shooting. After police stopped the vehicle, Rose and another passenger fled on foot. One officer fired his gun, and Rose went down.

A brief onlooker video shows two people jumping out of a car and running away. Seconds later, there are three gunshots. The woman taking the video can be heard saying, “Why are they shooting at them?” When a second woman tells her to “get down,” the videographer replies, “I’m recording.”

Rose was struck three times and later taken to the hospital, where he died. Police are still looking for the other passenger. The Allegheny County Police Superintendent confirmed that Rose was unarmed, according to Vox, and two guns were found in the car. A witness told reporters that Rose did not appear to be threatening the officers when he was shot. 

Other high-profile police shootings of black teenagers include three 2014 cases: 17-year-old Michael Brown, whose killing catalyzed the Black Lives Mattes movement; 12-year-old Tamir Rice, who was shot while playing by himself with a toy gun; and 17-year-old Laquan McDonald in Chicago, as well as last year’s killing of 15-year-old Jordan Edwards by police in Dallas.

According to KDKA, the officer who shot Rose had served on the local police force for only three weeks. He was placed on administrative leave.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate