Lawsuit Alleges Milwaukee Cop Involved in NBA Player’s Violent Arrest Later Joked About It on Facebook

The Milwaukee Bucks’ Sterling Brown wasn’t charged, and the city’s police chief apologized in May.

This Jan. 26, 2018 police body-camera footage released by Milwaukee Police Department shows NBA Bucks guard Sterling Brown as he talks to arresting police officers after being shot by a stun gun in a Walgreens parking lot in Milwaukee. MIlwaukee Police Department/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Tuesday, professional basketball player Sterling Brown filed a lawsuit against the city of Milwaukee, its police department, and officers, alleging that a wrongful January arrest violated his civil rights and turned excessive after officers used a stun gun on him for a parking violation.

A Milwaukee police officer confronted Brown outside a Walgreens at 2 a.m. on January 26 after the Milwaukee Bucks guard parked his car in two handicap parking spots. Following a tense conversation, the officer called for backup. Eventually, after asking Brown to take his hands out of his pockets, multiple officers took him to the ground—a confrontation that was captured in body camera footage that was released to the public in May. One officer yelled “Taser! Taser! Taser!” before using the weapon on Brown, who at the time “feared for his life,” according to the lawsuit.  

The lawsuit also accuses one of the Milwaukee police officers of sharing “racist” social-media posts, including one on Facebook that read: “Nice meeting Sterling Brown of the Milwaukee Bucks at work this morning! Lol#FearTheDeer.” The posts, the lawsuit claims, showed that officers are “allowed to engage in unlawful attacks and arrests of African Americans without justification and then relish such events without any fear of real discipline.” Brown was not charged for the altercation, and in May, Milwaukee Police Chief Alfonso Morales apologized to the 23-year-old, saying, “I am sorry this incident escalated to this level.” Milwaukee police suspended three officers and ordered eight to undergo training in professional communication.  

https://twitter.com/wesleylowery/status/1009097682571448321?s=21

At a news conference Tuesday, Brown’s attorney Mark Thomsen called the incident a “stain on the city.” “This federal lawsuit reflects the fact that for too long in this city African American men have been arrested, abused, and, as in the case of Dontre Hamilton, killed as a result of bad police work,” he said. In April 2014, a Milwaukee police officer fired 14 shots and killed Hamilton, who suffered from schizophrenia, after an altercation between the two at a park. In May 2017, Milwaukee paid $2.3 million to Hamilton’s family to settle a federal civil rights lawsuit. 

Brown isn’t the first athlete to sue a police department over the excessive use of force in recent years. Last April, New York City paid a $4 million settlement to then-Atlanta Hawks forward Thabo Sefolosha after he claimed five police officers used excessive force in arresting him outside a Manhattan nightclub in April 2015. Last June, the city also created a legal fellowship within the New York City Police Department that would investigate police misconduct as part of a civil rights lawsuit filed by retired tennis star James Blake. Blake sued New York City after surveillance footage showed an officer tackling him in Manhattan. (The cop who tackled Blake sued the tennis player for defamation.)

Last month, in an interview with the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, Brown, whose father was a police officer, recounted the incident, noting that he “gave in so they didn’t pull their guns out” and adding, “It’s common. It happens literally every single day in our community.” 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate