American Women Can Now Get Abortion Pills Shipped to Their Homes

“It’s humanitarian aid—it’s protecting women’s health and their lives.”

Charles McQuillan/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

For the first time, women in the United States who want abortions but are unable either to get to a clinic or afford clinic care can log on to a website, find evidence-based information about the procedure, and get abortion-inducing medication shipped directly to their homes. The website, called Aid Access, is run by Rebecca Gomperts, a doctor and activist in the Netherlands who has for years worked to increase access to safer, self-induced abortion in countries around the world where abortion is illegal. 

Her decision to start sending abortion drugs to women in the United States reflects a recognition of the increasing limits of clinic access, the existing prevalence of self-induced abortion, and the looming threat to the legal right to abortion in the country. 

“As a doctor I have the moral obligation to respond to health needs, and that’s why I decided to start Aid Access,” Gomperts told Mother Jones. “It’s humanitarian aid—it’s protecting women’s health and their lives.” 

There are already a handful of websites where women can purchase abortion pills, but the authenticity of what they’re getting is often unclear. And the website don’t always give information on how to safely use the drugs (that information is published by the World Health Organization.) The website also go dark regularly, leaving women seeking to self-manage their abortions with a patchwork system. 

In 1999, Gomperts founded Women on Waves, an organization that uses a Dutch ship anchored in international waters to provide medication abortion to women in countries where it is illegal. The “ship campaigns,” which have drawn significant media attention over the years, have helped women in Ireland, Poland, and Latin American end their pregnancies. In Ireland, and some countries in Latin America, Women on Waves’ work with activists on the ground has helped push for referenda and legislation to legalize abortion. In 2005, in response to a growing number of emails from women from around the world seeking her help, Gomperts launched Women on Web, an online service that ships the medication abortion pills, misoprostol and mifepristone, by mail. But Women on Web has never offered that service to the United States, because abortion is legal in the country. 

That’s not because there wasn’t a need. Gomperts says they received thousands of emails from women in the United States every year. She says the women who reached out to her typically couldn’t afford an abortion in a clinic, which can cost several hundred dollars even early in pregnancy, while the medication abortion she provides costs roughly $90. Other women would have had to travel hundreds of miles for the procedure. Instead of providing them the medication, she would connect them with local services, like abortion funds. 

That changed this year. In April, Gomperts launched Aid Access, which she emphasizes is separate from Women on Web, to counsel women seeking abortion in the United States and, for those who don’t have access to clinics, send drugs to their homes. Since then, Gomperts says she has helped about 600 American women self-induce. Barriers to access drove Gomperts to start the new service. And she says that when Trump was elected, she realized access to abortion in the United States would only get worse. While it became clear “that nothing is going to get better,” she notes, “if it would have been Hillary, there would have at least been attempts to make policy to improve the situation. Trump made it clear that women are worse off and Kavanaugh is only confirming that.” 

Women reach Gomperts through the website, where she counsels them on their options and determines whether an in-clinic or telemedicine abortion is available to them. If it isn’t, and if the woman is nine weeks pregnant or less, Gomperts who is a physician and holds a masters degree in public policy from Princeton University, will write a prescription for mifepristone and misoprostol. The prescription is filled in a country where it’s legal and then shipped to the woman. Gomperts shared with Mother Jones an email from one woman who successfully ended her pregnancy with their help. In the email, the woman thanks Gomperts for the service: 

Had I not had this resource, I would have had no other choice than to take extremely dangerous actions to get this same result. This kind of care is not accessible where I live, with the closest women’s center over 80 miles away. I’ve recommended this site to others because not only was it perfectly as advertised, but I felt confident and comfortable with the process given the information, and reassured with the ample resources for answering my questions. Thank you so much. I cannot even imagine where I would be without you.

Self-induced abortion is a controversial topic often characterized by outdated images of dangerous, back-alleys or coat hanger procedures. But with the advent of misoprostol and mifepristone over a decade ago, recent research suggests that ending a pregnancy on one’s own can be safe. A 2017 study conducted by researchers at University of Texas-Austin and Princeton University looked at 1,000 women who attempted self-managed abortions thanks to Women on Web and found that nearly 95 percent were successful. 

“After more than 15 years of use in the US, we know medication abortion is extremely safe and effective,” Daniel Grossman, a doctor and professor at the University of California-San Francisco, said in a statement. “When it comes to self-managing an abortion, research shows that when people have accurate information and access to high-quality medication, they can use the abortion pill safely and effectively on their own.”

For her part, Gomperts says she believes Aid Access will prevent women from using more dangerous methods. “It’s not acceptable to know that women are harming themselves and not do anything,” she says. “And I am in a position to do something.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate