California Won’t Charge Officers in the Stephon Clark Case—But the Feds Might

The DOJ and the FBI are stepping in.

Selena Manni, fiancée of Stephon Clark, wipes tears as she reacts to the decision by District Attorney Anne Marie Schubert to not press charges on Saturday.Renee C. Byer/Sacramento Bee/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Update (3/5/2019): Hours after Attorney General Xavier Becerra announced his office would not file criminal charges in the Stephon Clark case, federal authorities announced they will investigate whether Sacramento police officers violated Clark’s civil rights when they shot and killed the 22-year-old last March. US Attorney McGregor Scott and Special Agent Sean Ragan, who oversees the FBI’s Sacramento field office, said in a joint statement the investigation will be conducted with the US Justice Department’s civil rights division.

On Tuesday, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra announced that the state has declined to seek criminal charges against Sacramento police officers involved in the death of Stephon Clark, a 22-year-old black man who was killed last March in his grandparents’ backyard while holding a cellphone.

“Our investigation has concluded that no criminal charges against the officers involved in the shooting can be sustained,” Becerra told reporters at a press conference.

Becerra said the state’s 11-month independent review of the 22-minute interaction between Clark and the Sacramento officers found that Clark committed “unlawful acts” by breaking car windows and a neighbor’s sliding glass door and that he did not “follow officers’ commands.” Beccera added that Clark had “an object in his hands”—the cellphone—that officers believed was a gun and that he “advanced significantly toward the officers” during the incident. 

“Nothing can bring back Stephon Clark and nothing helps ends the pain that his family carries,” Becerra told reporters. He met with Clark’s mother ahead of the announcement. 

The state’s review determined that Sacramento police officers Terrence Mercadal and Jared Robinet acted lawfully when they fired 20 shots at Clark. Becerra emphasized that the state Justice Department’s probe is separate from Sacramento District Attorney Annie Marie Schubert’s investigation. 

On Saturday, after a review of footage from body cameras, helicopters, surveillance, and dashboard videos, Schubert concluded that Sacramento officers acted within their legal rights on the night Clark was killed. At the press conference, Schubert presented evidence that Clark was suicidal, claiming that two nights before the shooting, the mother of his children called 911 to report Clark for domestic violence. 

Clark’s death last March inspired protests in Sacramento and prompted lawmakers to pursue legislation to restrict the use of lethal force. On Monday night, Sacramento police arrested 84 people who were protesting Schubert’s decision. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate