Trump Is Throwing a Party to Celebrate His Paltry Criminal Justice Reform Efforts

The president brags about the First Step Act—but his proposed budget would barely fund its programs.

President Trump participates in a signing ceremony for the First Step Act in December.Martin Simon/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

President Donald Trump is hosting a party at the White House on Monday to celebrate the First Step Act, the first major criminal justice reform bill to pass Congress in a generation. Signed into law in December, it’s Trump’s biggest bipartisan victory so far—one he’s expected to tout on the campaign trail this year—and his team has invited about 300 guests to attend the event, including formerly incarcerated people. Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson will lead a session on reentry, and Ivanka Trump will help with another about incarcerated women.

But the celebration could be premature: Criminal justice reform groups point out that the administration has so far struggled to implement the law, and has failed to fully fund its programs. As Trump continues to brag about the measure, inmates at federal prisons around the country are left in limbo, and many wonder when or if they’ll see the benefits of the law’s promised reforms.

The First Step Act calls for $75 million in funding per year for five years, starting in 2019, to implement an array of changes to the federal prison system and sentencing rules. But Congress didn’t allocate any funds for the law in the 2019 fiscal year. And Trump’s proposed 2020 budget sets aside only $14 million to implement it, far short of the amount specified. 

Backers of the First Step Act are also concerned about the administration’s ability to follow through on another key goal of the law, which is to create new rehabilitation and training programs for prisoners, which lawmakers hope will help them find jobs when they reenter their communities and reduce their chances of recidivism. In order to determine which inmates can participate in these programs, the law required the Justice Department to set up a committee in January to develop a risk and needs assessment tool. But the department missed that deadline and even now has yet to convene the committee, raising doubts about whether it will successfully finish creating the tool by July, as the law mandates.

And a lot is riding on that tool. After it’s up and running, prisoners who participate in rehabilitative programs can be rewarded with additional time in halfway houses at the end of their sentence. Another crucial component of the law depends on the tool as well: The First Step Act promised to let incarcerated people accrue extra time off their sentences for good behavior, a change that some criminal justice reform groups believed would let about 4,000 prisoners head home right away. But as I reported in February, after the law passed, the Federal Bureau of Prisons announced that these prisoners can’t accrue the extra time off until the Justice Department finishes developing the risk assessment tool.

All these problems don’t discount the fact that the law has done some good so far: More than 500 inmates have been released, partly because of reforms to crack cocaine sentencing and “compassionate release,” which gives people dealing with serious illnesses a chance to go home. And according to the New York Times, the Federal Bureau of Prisons said in a recent budget justification document that funding the First Step Act is a “priority,” and that it plans to reserve $147 million in the 2020 fiscal year for activities related to the law’s implementation. A senior administration official told NPR that the administration hopes to set up the risk assessment committee “as soon as possible.”

“Americans have always believed in the power of redemption—that those who have fallen can work toward brighter days ahead,” Trump proclaimed ahead of the event, declaring that April would officially be Second Chance Month. “My Administration is committed to helping former prisoners reenter society as productive, law-abiding citizens.” But the missed deadlines and his own paltry budget requests will cast a shadow on the celebration and leave some wondering how much of it is just for show.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate