Eric Garner’s Death Is Still Haunting Bill de Blasio

His killing at the hands of a New York police officer five years ago loomed large in Wednesday’s presidential debate.

Angel Chevrestt/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Five years to the month that Eric Garner died as the result of a chokehold meted out by New York police officer Daniel Pantaleo, 10 Democratic candidates for president stood on the debate stage in Detroit and talked about criminal justice reform. And one of those candidates, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, can’t escape the shadow of Garner’s death.

That much was clear from the start of Wednesday night’s debate, as protesters in the audience chanted “Fire Pantaleo.” The officer has so far managed to avoid prosecution for Garner’s death and remains on the city’s police force. Some observers identified the protesters as Women’s March co-founders Tamika Mallory and Linda Sarsour, though Mother Jones could not confirm their identities.

After the protesters were escorted out, former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Julián Castro attacked de Blasio for not firing Pantaleo, saying that the officer “has not been brought to justice.”

Garner was a 42-year-old black man who was confronted by Pantaleo on Staten Island in 2014 for allegedly selling unlicensed cigarettes. The ensuing alteraction was captured on video by a bystander. The video—in which Garner can be heard repeatedly yelling, “I can’t breathe!”—went viral and set off a national protest movement against police brutality. That movement was led in part by Garner’s daughter, Erica, who staged sit-ins and protests demanding accountability for her father’s death.

A Staten Island grand jury declined to bring charges against Pantaleo, and earlier this month, the Trump administration’s Department of Justice did the same. In 2015, the Garner family reached a wrongful death settlement with New York City for $5.9 million. Still, the case took its toll. Erica Garner died from a heart attack shortly after Christmas in 2017. She was 27.

When CNN host Jake Tapper questioned the candidates about the case, observers noted that he appeared to refer to Garner as “Gardner.” (The official transcript has Tapper saying “Garner,” but here’s the clip—judge for yourself at 1:30 and 4:05.)

Garner’s surviving relatives have been steadfast in their demand for Pantaleo’s termination. “The DOJ made their decision,” Garner’s mother, Gwen Carr, told reporters recently. “We are looking for de Blasio to make his. We want him to stand up as the mayor he’s supposed to be.”

New York City’s public advocate, Jumaane Williams, has also taken aim at de Blasio, telling the mayor via the New York Times, “You cannot be president, you cannot be the Democratic nominee, if Daniel Pantaleo is still on the force.”

Instead, the officer has received a 14 percent raise while working desk duty.

Meanwhile, de Blasio has repeatedly said publicly that his hands are tied and he does not have the power to fire Pantaleo—a point of deep contention among local advocates and many observers.

What’s clear is that while de Blasio delivers a populist message nationally, he’s far from a progressive hero at home.

This story has been updated to include more details of Tapper’s apparent mispronunciation of Eric Garner’s name.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate