Southern California Jails Have Become COVID Superspreaders

The ACLU predicted this months ago.

FG Trade/Getty

The coronavirus is a rapidly developing news story, so some of the content in this article might be out of date. Check out our most recent coverage of the coronavirus crisis, and subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

This week, COVID-19 cases in Orange County jails increased more than 400 percent. It’s exactly what the ACLU saw coming.

In June, the ACLU, on behalf of half a dozen detainees housed in various Orange County jails, sued the sheriff in state court, arguing that the jails were superspreaders-in-waiting: the cramped quarters, inadequate cleaning protocols, and severely limited hygiene make jails an ideal hunting ground for the virus. Many detainees are at heightened risk of getting gravely ill because of underlying health conditions (according to the lawsuit, the county has already identified more than 500 inmates at risk of serious infection). But the jails don’t usually have robust health care facilities on site, so, the lawsuit argued, infected inmates would need to be transferred to one of the county hospitals if they require a ventilator or other specialized care. Given the strain on hospitals that already exists, adding in patients from a jail outbreak “could result in a humanitarian disaster.” 

After months of hearings, a judge ruled last week in favor of the ACLU and ordered the jails to cut their populations in half—by either releasing or relocating detainees—to allow for adequate social distancing in the facilities. Superior Court Judge Peter Wilson’s order builds on a similar ruling from a California appeals court back in October, which required San Quentin prison to drastically reduce its inmate population. Both Wilson and the appeals court panel found that corrections officials had shown “deliberate indifference” toward the health and safety of their charges, in violation of a myriad of state and federal constitutional rights. The Orange County Jails were specifically found to have violated the state constitutional rights of pre-trial detainees, as well as those of disabled inmates.

“We have seen again and again in this suit and in similar litigation around the country, corrections officials have not taken the necessary steps to protect incarcerated people from the spread of COVID-19, nor have they been honest about the circumstances and risk levels in their facilities,” said Cassandra Stubbs, director of the ACLU’s Capital Punishment Project in a statement shortly after the ruling. “Public health experts and epidemiological studies have been clear: This country won’t be able to get the pandemic under control unless we’re able to get it under control in prisons and jails.”

In a court hearing, lawyers representing Orange County argued that the jails had already decreased their populations and implemented other safety measures—including mandatory temperature checks, scaling up COVID testing, and providing staff with PPE—claiming to have created a “COVID bubble” among the jails. But that bubble has clearly popped: As of Tuesday, more than 400 people in the county’s jails had tested positive, compared with just 74 the week before.

“Jails are not closed off from the communities around them,” says the ACLU’s complaint. “[E]very day, custody, medical, and support staff and contractors who have direct contact with detainees enter and leave the facility, along with detainees who are newly booked into the jail, leave and return for court hearings, and leave upon release.”

By one estimate, prisons and jails were linked to half a million new COVID cases this summer alone. In California, researchers from the Prison Policy Institute concluded that more than 113,000 cases were linked to mass incarceration. 

In Orange County, Sheriff Don Barnes has until the end of the month to submit to the court a plan to release or relocate the necessary detainees. So far, only two of the plaintiffs on the case have been released. Barnes took to Fox News this week to say he would not comply with the order, because the jail’s remaining detainees “posed a serious threat” to the community. He said the county plans to appeal the ruling. 

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate