Ahead of Chauvin Verdict, Republicans Attack a Familiar Target: a Black Woman

The racist, false attacks on Maxine Waters.

Dominick Sokotoff/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

As the country awaits a verdict in the murder trial of Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolis police officer charged with killing George Floyd, Republicans have pounced on a familiar target: a Black woman.

“This weekend in Minnesota, Maxine Waters broke the law by violating curfew and then incited violence,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said on Monday. In the same tweet, McCarthy—who in recent months declined to do anything about Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) after social media posts indicating support for murdering top Democrats emerged—also revealed that he was moving to censure Waters over her comments telling protesters to keep up their demonstrations.

In those remarks, Waters did not actually call for violence. Here’s what she actually said: “We’ve got to stay on the street,” the California Democrat said Saturday during a protest over the recent police killing of Duane Wright just miles from where Floyd died. “And we’ve got to get more active. We’ve got to get more confrontational. We’ve got to make sure that they know that we mean business.”

Conservatives of all stripes, from Greene to Sen. Ted Cruz, quickly seized on the comments. “Democrats are actively encouraging violence,” the Texas senator said. “They want to tear us apart.”

The attacks are part of a long tradition of Republicans distorting Waters’ remarks and draw on the racist trope of the angry Black woman. They also seem to be part of an effort by Republicans to distract attention from their own extremist rhetoric.

“No, in fact, President Trump used the words ‘peaceful’ when he talked about the statements that he made,” Rep. Steve Scalise told reporters Tuesday when asked if Waters’ comments could be compared to Trump’s repeated incitement ahead of the January 6 Capitol insurrection. “I haven’t heard Maxine saying anything about peacefully protesting. She’s talked about violence.”

This is simply false. “I am nonviolent,” Water told theGrio on Monday. “I talk about confronting the justice system, confronting the policing that’s going on, I’m talking about speaking up. I’m talking about legislation.”

But while the demonization of Waters is nothing new, that this latest bout of fake outrage against one of Congress’ most high-profile Black members—in the middle of one of the most consequential police murder trials in recent years—is especially difficult to watch. It’s all but certain, as the country braces for possible unrest following the verdict, that Republicans will continue to point the finger at Waters, accusing a Black woman of promoting any potential violence. And Waters noted as much this week. “Republicans will jump on any word, any line, and try to make it fit their message and their cause for denouncing us and denying us, basically calling us violent,” she told theGrio.

“I am not worried that they’re going to continue to distort what I say,” she continued. “This is who they are and this is how they act. And I’m not going to be bullied by them.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate