San Francisco’s New DA Plans to Reverse Key Criminal Justice Reforms

Brooke Jenkins wants to undo changes made by her predecessor, Chesa Boudin.

Brooke Jenkins attends a news conference at San Francisco's City Hall on July 7. Santiago Mejia/San Francisco Chronicle via AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

One month after San Francisco voters removed District Attorney Chesa Boudin in a recall election, the city’s mayor has picked an interim replacement who is expected to be tougher on crime and roll back some of Boudin’s most significant reforms.

Brooke Jenkins, 40, is a former prosecutor who resigned from Boudin’s office in 2021 after accusing him of mismanagement and arguing that his policies were allowing criminals to escape punishment. She spent months working to recall Boudin, a former public defender who tried to reduce mass incarceration by diverting more low-level offenders from prison. Jenkins will serve until November, when voters decide if she will finish the rest of the term ending in December 2023.

“As your next district attorney, I will restore accountability and consequences to our criminal justice system here in San Francisco,” Jenkins said at a press conference Thursday. She said her main goals would be ending open-air drug markets in the city and prosecuting hate crimes against Asian Americans, which increased in recent years. She also pledged to focus on property crimes.

“Violence and repeat offenders will no longer be allowed to victimize our city without consequences,” Jenkins added, echoing claims from Boudin’s critics that lawlessness spiraled out of control during his term. As I previously reported, that claim is not supported by data, and San Francisco’s overall violent crime actually decreased during the pandemic to its lowest point since 1985. “We are a city of second chances,” Jenkins said, “but the truth is we have to draw a line with people who choose hate, violence, and a life of crime.”

Despite her focus on tougher penalties, Jenkins, who is Black and Latina, has described herself as a progressive prosecutor. “Holding offenders accountable does not preclude us from moving forward with vital and important reforms to our criminal justice system,” she said Thursday. “I vow to balance both in the pursuit of justice and safety for all.”

But she signaled that she plans to roll back many of the progressive policies that Boudin pursued. Jenkins has said that unlike Boudin, she wants prosecutors to have the power to request cash bail and gang enhancements, which disproportionately penalize low-income people and people of color. She also wants to give prosecutors the discretion to charge juvenile offenders as adults.

Some progressive activists in San Francisco worry about these plans. “San Francisco’s Black community will not be silent nor endorse any Black candidate that is seeking to go back to the 80s and 90s policies of locking everyone up and throwing away the key,” Geoffrea Morris, a community leader who runs a domestic violence organization and whose brother was killed by San Pablo police, said in a statement, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

“Anyone can say they are a ‘progressive prosecutor’—it’s now a meaningless term,” public defender Ilona Solomon told the Chronicle.

Solomon was the lead defense attorney in the case that inspired Jenkins to resign from Boudin’s office. The defendant in that case, Daniel Gudino, allegedly killed his mother during a mental health crisis in which he believed she was possessed by a demon. As a prosecutor, Jenkins tried to send Gudino to prison for life, even after she failed to have the court declare him mentally sane. She quit after Boudin’s office declined to proceed with a retrial when the jury deadlocked.

Mayor London Breed, in announcing Jenkins’ appointment on Thursday, said she made the decision after speaking with people who opposed and supported the recall. Breed chose from a pool of candidates that included former prosecutor Nancy Tung and Supervisor Catherine Stefani, a vocal supporter of law enforcement. “We have a lot of work to do to ensure that everyone feels safe in our city,” Breed said in a statement. “I know that from day one, Brooke will make sure that not only people are held accountable for the crimes they commit, but will also continue to push forward our work to reform our criminal justice system.”

The police, who often opposed Boudin, seemed happy about her appointment. In a statement, the union representing cops in the city described her as “a qualified, competent and compassionate prosecutor who will allow San Francisco to turn the page from” Boudin, whom the union described as “the previous criminal defense attorney masquerading as the DA.”

When Jenkins runs in the November election, she could very well face off against her former boss; Boudin has not ruled out the possibility of trying to reclaim his seat. Jenkins, when asked whether she expects to see tangible results from her policies by then, told the New York Times that it was difficult to answer the question. “People are going to have to be patient. They’re going to have to temper their expectations,” she said, noting that it would take time to hire prosecutors and implement her ideas.

“No district attorney,” she told the Times, “can snap their fingers and do away with all crime.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate