A 6-Year-Old Shot His Teacher With a Gun Purchased by His Mom

School shooters frequently obtain firearms from their own homes.

Messages for teacher Abby Zwerner, who was shot by a 6-year-old student, posted at Richneck Elementary School in Newport News, Va., on Jan. 9, 2023.John C. Clark/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A shocking act of gun violence took place on Friday at an elementary school in Newport News, Virginia, where a 6-year-old boy used a gun he’d brought to school to shoot his teacher during class. The act was “intentional,” according to local authorities, who have not yet disclosed a possible motive. The teacher, 25-year-old Abigail Zwerner, was wounded in the hand and chest by the single gunshot fired by the boy; she helped evacuate children from her classroom at Richneck Elementary before being transported to a local hospital (where she was in stable condition as of Monday). A school employee restrained the boy until police arrived.

At a press conference on Monday afternoon, Newport News Police Chief Steve Drew revealed new details about the case: The gun used in the shooting, he said, was a Taurus 9mm pistol. It had been legally purchased by the boy’s mother.  

The boy and his mother have not been identified publicly by authorities. After interviewing the two of them, Drew told reporters, “We determined that the firearm was in the residence where they lived, and the child obtained that firearm, placed it in his backpack and brought it to school.” His mom had taken him to school on Friday morning, Drew added.

“This is unprecedented, and we’re dealing with a 6-year-old,” he reiterated, noting that police had quickly sought guidance from the commonwealth attorney’s office and agencies specializing in child services. “None of us have a lot of information dealing with something like this,” he said. Using an “emergency custody order,” police transported the boy to a local hospital for a mental health evaluation.

The boy has not been charged with a crime, and police are still investigating specifically how he got possession of the gun. Authorities have not yet decided whether to charge anyone else in connection with the shooting, Drew said.

Virginia has no laws requiring gun owners to lock up or otherwise safely store unattended firearms. According to the Giffords Law Center, the state “prohibits anyone from recklessly leaving a loaded, unsecured firearm in such a manner as to endanger the life or limb of any child under the age of 14.” (There does not appear to be any law addressing a potential adult victim at the hands of a child.) It is also unlawful in Virginia “for any person knowingly to authorize a child under the age of 12 to use a firearm except when the child is under the supervision of an adult.”

Drew emphasized that the tragedy on Friday was not an active-shooter situation (a comment that in its own right underscored the astonishing age of the shooter) and was contained to the single classroom. Yet, the provenance of the gun is a disturbing reminder that school shootings frequently are carried out with weapons that kids obtain from their own homes. Among the many examples is another particularly grim recent case: the mass shooting at Oxford High School in Michigan.

Children accidentally or intentionally using firearms to shoot people remains an under-reported issue in the United States. Such tragedy occurs hundreds of times a year, as I first documented in an investigation a decade ago. 

Virginia has been a leader in the emerging violence-prevention work of behavioral threat assessment, but it has also been an epicenter for high-profile disasters: the Virginia Tech massacre in 2007; the on-camera murder of two TV journalists in Roanoke in 2015; and several workplace mass shootings, including at a government office in Virginia Beach in 2019 and at a Walmart in Chesapeake late last year. The Charlottesville community is still reeling from the shooting in November at the University of Virginia that took the lives of three football players.

Now, a 6-year-old pulling the trigger marks the latest on the list.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate