A New DOJ Report Paints a Damning Picture of the Minneapolis Police

The conclusion seems clear: Derek Chauvin was not an anomaly.

Mother Jones; Stringer/Sputnik/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

After a two-year Department of Justice investigation into the Minneapolis Police Department—that involved a review of thousands of documents, incident files, body-worn camera videos, and department data—Attorney General Merrick Garland revealed his findings today. They were damning. If you look at “MPD as a whole,” Garland said in Minneapolis, there were clear “systemic problems.”

The conclusion seems clear: Derek Chauvin was not an anomaly. “The patterns and practices of conduct the Justice Department observed during our investigation are deeply disturbing,” said Garland. “They erode the community’s trust in law enforcement. And they made what happened to George Floyd possible.” Taken together, the report states there is “reasonable cause to believe that MPD and the City engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives people of their rights under the Constitution and federal law.” This included violations of the 1st and 4th amendments, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, the Safe Streets Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The report provides further explanation as to why the city reacted the way it did after George Floyd’s murder. “These systemic issues didn’t just occur on May 25, 2020,” an unnamed city leader is quoted saying in the report. “These were instances…being reported by this community long before that.” 

The report had four core findings:

  • The MPD used excessive, and at times, deadly force. The investigation found that the MPD had discharged firearms without assessing if a person presented a threat. They highlighted previous high-profile cases of fatal police shootings, including Jamar Clark, Justine Ruszczyk, Thurman Blevins, Chiasher Vue, and Amir Locke. They also noted the repeated use of the style of neck restraint that Chauvin used to kill Floyd. “Until 2020, MPD did not consider neck restraints to be deadly force, instead classifying them as ‘less-lethal’ force,” the report states.  
  • The department has engaged in racial discrimination against Black and Native American people in stops, searches, and uses of force. The report shows that the department stopped Black and Native people six times more often than white people. Furthermore, officers who engaged in racism were not punished until after a public outcry, including one incident in which an officer told a car full of Somali teenagers: “Do you remember what happened in Black Hawk Down when we killed a bunch of you folk? I’m proud of that…We didn’t finish the job over there…if we had…you guys wouldn’t be over here right now.” 
  • Police in Minneapolis have violated the rights of people with protected speech—such as protesters and journalists. It highlights instances during the protests when police congratulated one another for hitting fleeing protesters with rubber bullets: “You hit him! Nice!” The report states, “These indiscriminate uses of force suggest that officers’ true purpose is not to prevent criminal activity, but to retaliate against protesters for their constitutionally protected speech.” On May 30, a journalist was slammed to the ground and pepper sprayed while stating his profession and holding his credentials in front of an officer. In another instance, an “officer pepper sprayed two bystanders to a potential suicide call after they questioned what officers were doing. The two bystanders, who were friends of the person in crisis, remained a distance away from the officers and the person, and were not interfering with the police activity. Nevertheless, an officer walked over to them and sprayed them in their faces in response to their questions.”
  • The MPD mistreats people with behavioral health disabilities. MPD’s response to the majority of behavioral health-related calls “is often harmful and ineffective,” the report states.  Investigators “identified numerous examples of MPD officers unnecessarily escalating situations and in many cases using avoidable force against people with behavioral health disabilities,” including the use of tasers and potentially deadly neck restraints. 

The report acknowledges that MPD morale “is at an all-time low,” and Garland assured current MPD police officers that their “profession is essential.”

The DOJ and the city have agreed in principle to the terms of a legally binding consent decree, which will be separate and independent from the state consent decree with the Minnesota Human Rights Department, whose investigation was released in March. According to MPR it is the “first time a city in the country has been subject to court-enforced settlement agreements from both federal and state governments at the same time.”

In November, the new MPD chief Brian O’Hara was sworn in after a nationwide search. O’Hara touted his experience working in Newark, New Jersey, where he helped oversee the implementation of a federal consent decree. 

Garland and his team spoke highly of the potential for consent decrees to help reform departments across the country, but in some cities they have had mixed results

You can read the full DOJ Investigation here.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate