Crying Foul Over a Loon Decision

Why conservationists are saying Obama’s Interior Department hasn’t changed its Bush-era ways.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When it comes to protecting imperiled wildlife, a task that ranked low on the Bush administration’s list of priorities, little has changed at Obama’s Interior Department. At least that’s what conservation groups are saying, and they point to a recent decision by the agency as evidence that it hasn’t departed from its Bush-era ways.

At issue is the yellow-billed loon. On Tuesday, the Interior Department announced that its inclusion on the endangered species list was “warranted but precluded.” Essentially this means that the available science suggests this bird population requires Endangered Species Act protection, but the agency has no plans to go forward with a listing anytime soon. The decision relegates the loon, which number somewhere between 16,000 and 32,000 globally, to a list containing 250 other plants and animals that Interior considers deserving of protection but says it can’t officially protect due to a lack of resources. The Center for Biological Diversity’s Brendan Cummings calls this “administrative purgatory,” and he notes that some species have remained in limbo for two decades, during which time 24 have gone extinct.

Plants and animals on the “precluded” list are ranked on a scale of 1 to 12—with 1 indicating the most threatened species—and are reviewed every year to gauge whether their status has changed. Presently, the yellow-billed loon rates an 8, which puts it ahead of the southern Idaho ground squirrel (9) but behind such species as the Baker Station cave beetle (5), the Georgia pigtoe (2), and the lesser prairie-chicken (2).

Species are supposedly wait-listed so that other, more imperiled wildlife can be added to the ESA list. Yet, Cummings says, Interior has made little progress in clearing the backlog in recent years, listing only two species under the ESA in the past 35 months—”the slowest listing rate in the ESA’s history.”

Interior’s decision on the loon, which breeds in Alaska’s tundra wetlands, in areas slated for oil development, may come as welcome news to Governor Sarah Palin, who is already fighting a two-front endangered species battle. Fearing that endangered listings—and the review processes that accompany them—could hinder oil and gas development, Palin’s administration sued the Interior Department in August over its decision to list the polar bear under the ESA. In January, Palin threatened the Commerce Department with the same over its listing of the Cook Inlet beluga whale. (In Palin’s FY 2010 budget, which slashed Alaska’s overall spending by nearly a half-billion dollars, she upped the budget of the state’s Department of Law specifically to fight ESA listings.)

“You can pretty much guarantee that Palin would have condemned the loon decision if it had been an actual listing proposal,” says Cummings. In this case, though, the feds saved her the trouble.

Responding to criticism from groups like the Center for Biological Diversity and the Natural Resources Defense Council, Fish and Wildlife Service spokesman Bruce Woods says the yellow-billed loon decision is not about politics, but about practicality. “It’s driven by budget and staff time,” he says. “As you know, federal agencies have taken some pretty big hits in recent years.” Alluding to the Bush years, when the administration was ideologically opposed to the Endangered Species Act and installed a political appointee with no scientific background to oversee Interior’s ESA program, Woods said, “I think everybody knows that there was a long period when there was very little listing action going forward. On the other hand, between ’02 and ’04 14 species moved off the candidate list to listing.” He adds, “I anticipate that we will be seeing more action going forward than we have in the recent past, although that’s only my personal anticipation. No one has made that promise to me.”

For now, at least, it seems to Cummings and other conservationists that Interior Secretary Ken Salazar is continuing the ESA policies of his Bush-era predecessor, Dirk Kempthorne. “The loon finding runs completely at odds with Obama’s pronouncements of putting science first,” says Cummings.

If nothing else, the loon decision was oddly timed. Days earlier, Salazar had unveiled Interior’s first ever report on the state of bird populations in the US, which found that “nearly a third of the nation’s 800 bird species are endangered, threatened or in significant decline.” Remarking on this news, Salazar said, “From shorebirds in New England to warblers in Michigan to songbirds in Hawaii, we are seeing disturbing downward population trends that should set off environmental alarm bells.” Conservationists wholeheartedly agree. They’re just waiting for Salazar to respond to the alarm.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate