The Melting Climate Change Deadline

Has cap-and-trade legislation stalled in the Senate?

Photo by flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lhirlimann/2787609882/">lhirlimann</a> used under a <a href="http://www.creativecommons.org">Creative Commons</a> license.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Does cap-and-trade climate change legislation belong on the endangered species list? President Obama wanted to sign a measure before the international climate talks in Copenhagen in December. The House passed the Waxman-Markey bill in June, and Senate majority leader Harry Reid set a firm timetable for the Senate to follow suit. But now the Senate has jettisoned its deadline for the bill, and momentum to quickly pass legislation appears to be vanishing.

 

The earlier plan was for all six Senate committees with responsibility for writing cap and trade to mark up a bill by September 28—the deadline set by Reid that was already an extension from a previous target of September 10. To meet this goal, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee charged with writing the bulk of the legislation, initially said her panel would produce a bill and vote on it in early August. That didn’t work out, but she promised the legislation would be done right after summer recess.

Now, not only is there still no bill, but talk of a concrete deadline has disappeared entirely. Boxer’s panel will only commit to producing a bill—not voting on it—”later in September,” according to a statement. Reid’s office is even more vague, merely saying that the majority leader “fully expects the Senate to have ample time to consider this comprehensive clean energy and climate legislation before the end of the year.”

“Chairs are very resistant to pointing to any kind of deadline,” explains a senior Senate staffer involved in the process. “They’ve had a series of moving target deadlines that keep slipping and slipping. We’re not talking about any more deadlines.”

A major reason for the delay is, of course, the fracas over health care reform, which is also running behind schedule. The Senate Finance Committee is pivotal in health care negotiations but also claims responsibility for the allocation of pollution permits in cap and trade. Sen. Max Baucus, (D-Mont.) the committee’s chair and the second-ranking Democrat on Boxer’s panel, will play a critical role in the maneuvering over climate legislation. And he doesn’t appear to be in any noticeable hurry. “As far as timing, really the best I can say is after health care,” says the Senate Finance Committee’s spokesman, Dan Virkstis.

Nor is health care the only issue threatening to crowd out cap and trade on the congressional agenda. “Financial services reform is coming up fast on the rail,” says one Senate aide, noting that that could overtake the climate debate and push it back to “October and perhaps November.” The Obama White House has signaled that it is more eager to proceed with financial regulation—an initiative, unlike cap and trade, that doesn’t come with a big price tag.

Environmental groups contacted by Mother Jones maintain that the delay is no cause for panic. “I think there’s still time to get this done by Copenhagen,” says John Coequyt, the Sierra Club’s senior Washington representative. Tony Kreindler of the Environmental Defense Fund points to similarly discouraging moments when the Waxman-Markey bill was inching through the House. “Back then everyone was yelling and screaming about the stimulus and you didn’t hear a whole lot about climate change. But that whole time Waxman and Markey were quite busy under the radar,” he notes. “Then all of a sudden the bill was out of committee.”

Kreindler adds that because Boxer’s committee holds a 12-7 Democratic majority, it could vote out a bill at any time it chose, and argues that the delay is actually an encouraging sign that senators are taking the time to get the details right. That could certainly be part of the explanation. But another consideration is surely the formidable task of crafting legislation that will reduce carbon emissions but can also secure the votes of wavering Democrats in the wider Senate, particularly four centrists who have called for pushing back cap and trade until next year: Byron Dorgan, Kent Conrad, Ben Nelson, and Blanche Lincoln—who just took over the chair of the agriculture committee, which will also contribute to the bill.

Given all that, it’s little wonder that Senate aides from committees that are working on cap and trade aren’t brimming with confidence that a measure will move forward anytime soon. “I don’t think anyone can predict [when a bill will emerge],” says one. “With all the other priorities, folks are wondering if we are ever going to get there.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate