Dope and Glory

From Viagra to Vancouver, our brave new performance enhancing world.

Illustration: Ross MacDonald

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Exhibit presents a snapshot of a single topic with a collection of stats, trivia, and factual found objects. This time‘s theme: performance enhancement.

20% of women and 10% of men describe themselves as unattractive. 12 years ago, only 1% of all Americans did.

Americans spent $10.3 billion on cosmetic surgery in 2008, a 388% increase since 1997.

The Miss California pageant paid for Carrie Prejean‘s breast implants so she could “present herself in the best possible light” in the 2009 Miss USA contest.

After scandals cost Prejean her crown, in October the California pageant sued her for the $5,200 price of the surgery.

Stripper Chesty Love successfully sued the IRS in 1994 so she could deduct $2,088 for breast implants. Siding with her, a judge cited her 56FF bosom as a stage prop.

Chesty

85% of women say they’re satisfied with the size of their partner’s penis. 55% of men are content with their own size.

Last April, Rep. James Moran (D-Va.) introduced the Families for ED Advertising Decency Act, which would ban radio and TV ads for male enhancement drugs between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.

The World Anti-Doping Agency has tested Viagra—which increases the blood’s oxygen-carrying capacity—on college athletes to see if it should be banned. One test subject said, “It may take a while to live this one down.”

Two years after Major League slugger Rafael Palmeiro was a Viagra pitchman, he tested positive for steroids.

In the 3 years after he started using steroids, Barry Bonds went from hitting 34 homers a year to 73—a 115% jump.

Asked if he’d used steroids for his 2008 comeback in The Wrestler, Mickey Rourke said, “When I’m a wrestler, I behave like a wrestler.”

Princeton economists have found that every additional 4 inches of height corresponds to a 10% increase in earnings.

Tom Cruise (5’7″) wears 2-inch lifts. So does French president Nicolas Sarkozy (5’5″).

The 5’11” founder of Make Me Taller, a Web forum on “cosmetic leg lengthening,” has surgically stretched his legs 3 inches. “When I shake hands with someone that used to be taller than me, and find myself looking down at them, it makes me feel great,” he says.

2/3 of plastic surgeons have had patients ask for surgery to “remain competitive in the workplace.”

An Asian American woman who considered having her eyelids surgically “Westernized” told Oprah in 2007, “It’s like having a great degree from a better school.”

Brain

1 in 5 college students say they’ve taken Adderall, Ritalin, or other prescription drugs to help with their work. 1/5 of scientists surveyed by Nature say the same.

Last year, bioethicists wrote in Nature that cognitive enhancing drugs are “morally equivalent to” getting a good night’s sleep.

“You Can Sleep When You’re 30″ was the slogan of Anheuser-Busch’s BE alcoholic energy drink, which it pulled in June 2008 after several states began investigating alleged marketing to minors.

“Mania Associated With an Energy Drink,” a 2001 article in the Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, concluded that Red Bull might trigger “pathological mood switches.”

Stay Alert caffeinated chewing gum, supplied to all US front-line troops, has 25% more caffeine per piece than a can of Red Bull.

In 2003, the World Anti-Doping Agency added the anti-narcolepsy drug Provigil to its list of banned stimulants. Three months later, the Air Force approved it as a “go pill” to keep pilots awake.

The Pentagon has developed a mechanical exoskeleton that makes lifting 200 pounds feel like lifting 20.

The $265 million “brain fitness” software market has grown 165% since 2005.

80% of the members of the World Transhumanist Association say they’d consider having the contents of their brains “uploaded to computers.”

One benefit of this, according to the WTA (now called Humanity+): “You could potentially live much more economically as an upload since you wouldn’t need physical food, housing, transportation, etc.”

Transhumanist Ray Kurzweil predicts that “the singularity”—when machines’ intelligence will surpass humans’—will come as soon as 2045.

Behold

In December 2008, a Los Angeles clinic offered prenatal screening for hair color, eye color, and complexion. After outcry about “designer babies,” it stopped.

Microsoft holds a patent for a device that would distribute “power and data to devices coupled to the human body.”

Cybernetics professor Kevin Warwick eagerly awaits the day when people will interact via brain implants. He concedes, “We will still fall back on speech in order to communicate with our newborns, however, since it will take a few years before they can safely get implants of their own.”

For sources, click here.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate