A Chimney Sweep’s Top 5 Tips for Ecofriendly (and Cheap!) Fires

Chim-chiminy, chim-chiminy, chim-chim-charee, here’s how to reduce the environmental impact of your fireplace. Wheee!

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yu23HHmOG48" target="_blank">Mary Poppins</a>/YouTube

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

It’s no secret that fireplaces and woodstoves—wonderful and cozy though they may be—are not great for the environment. The smoke that they produce is full of harmful particles, including, according to the EPA, volatile organic compounds and the likely carcinogen benzo(a)pyrene. Smoke can foul up the air both inside and out, and exposure to the stuff can cause serious respiratory problems.

So should you board up your hearth for good? Not necessarily. The right equipment can help, as can proper burning techniques.

To find out exactly how to make the most efficient fire possible, I enlisted the help of Clay Thompson, a working chimney sweep based in Sacramento, California. According to the Chimney Safety Institute of America, there are about 5,000 working chimney sweeps in the United States. You may be as disappointed as I was to learn that Thompson, who has been sweeping six chimneys a day five days a week for 13 years, says that unlike that other notorious chimney sweep, Mary Poppins’ boyfriend, he sings only in the car and never dances. Also, he uses brushes instead of, you know, climbing on in. “Most modern chimneys are only six inches wide,” he says. “I don’t know how Santa does it.” Anyway, here are Thompson’s tips:

  1. If you have a fireplace, consider an insert. A fireplace insert is like a wood-burning stove that fits right into your fireplace. EPA-certified models burn 70 percent more efficiently than an open fireplace.
     
  2. Chimney sweep Clay ThompsonChimney sweep Clay ThompsonUpgrading to new equipment could save you money. If your fireplace insert or stove was made before 1992, you might want to consider a newer, EPA-certified model. Although they can be pricey, the agency-approved stoves and inserts not only produce less smoke and soot, they’re also 50 percent more efficient than traditional models—so you’ll end up spending less on fuel. They’re also much easier to clean, says Thompson: “I dread those old inserts. They weigh 600 pounds, and then there’s six to eight inches of soot inside. You can’t even see anything, and it takes two and a half hours. I have to change my clothes after that. I work as a chimney sweep but I don’t like getting dirty.” For several years, people who upgraded their fireplaces and wood stoves qualified for a federal tax credit, but that program expired this year. Some states offer their own programs; the Alliance for Green Heat lists them here.
     
  3. Burn the right kind of fuel. Rule of thumb: The cooler your fire, the more particulate emissions and soot it produces. In order to ensure that your fire is hot enough, Thompson recommends using only wood that has been “seasoned” (dried) for at least a year. Hard woods (like maple, ash, oak, and beech) burn hotter than soft woods (pine and fir). Most importantly, never burn wet wood. Pellet stoves, which take bricks made of compressed wood or other organic materials, generally burn cleaner and more efficiently than woodstoves or fireplaces. This EPA chart compares particle emissions from various heat sources:

    Image courtesy of EPAImage courtesy of EPA
     

  4. Use the right sized grate for your fireplace. “A lot of people buy a grate that is too big for their fireplace and then spread out the logs,” says Thompson. For the hottest and hence cleanest-burning fire possible, “you want those logs all bundled together in the center.”
     
  5. Skip the home chimney-cleaning remedies. There are a bunch of old wives’ tales about DIY chimney sweeping; Thompson says that several of his customers have tried to clean their chimneys by starting a fire with potato peels or rock salt. “Those don’t seem to work.” Another bad idea: “Some people try to start a chimney fire to clean their chimney,” he says. “Sometimes it does clean it, but sometimes it burns your house down.” For newer model fireplace inserts and stoves, Thompson recommends a professional inspection and sweeping about every two years, or one cleaning for every cord of wood burned. But if you have older equipment, or if you regularly burn wood that isn’t properly seasoned, you could end up needing a sweeping much more frequently. Thompson’s company charges $149 for a one-story sweeping, but prices vary by region.

It should also be noted that the while fuel stoves in the United States are often considered ornamental, Europeans are increasingly using pellet stoves as a primary source of heat. The Alliance for Green Heat points out that these stoves produce fewer climate-warming greenhouse gases than fossil fuels.

Wood and pellet stoves are far from the only hearth-based heat contraptions available. If you’d like to geek out on hydronic heaters, masonry heaters, and more, the EPA’s site on appliances is a good place to start. Want to compare efficiency and emissions of various models? Go further down the rabbit hole with Cornell Cooperative Extension’s extremely thorough guide

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate