The Warming Climate Could Scorch America’s West

Scientists see similarities between today’s climate and one that existed 15,000 years ago, when the earth was toasting its glaciers to emerge from an ice age.

Tracy Barbutes/ZUMA


This story first appeared on the Atlantic Cities website and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

Long-lasting drought has been the force behind several of this year’s American calamities. Hot temperatures and scarce rainfall set the stage for the explosive development of California’s Rim Fire, turned Utah into one big disaster zone, and prolonged the worst drought in Colorado since the 1950s.

These western areas should brace themselves for even more onslaughts of ugly parching, according to a new study that suggests a warmer climate will bake them (as well as many other places) like a Spicy Wing Zing under a 7-Eleven heat lamp.

Wallace Broecker and Aaron Putnam are researchers at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory who have a keen interest in paleoclimatology, or how the climate changes over the course of history. Whereas many of today’s scientists study data from the past century recorded at worldwide monitoring stations, Putnam and Broecker are digging back thousands of years by looking at things like stalagmites, tree rings, and ice cores. What they think they’ve found is a worrying similarity between the modern climate and one that existed 15,000 years ago, when the earth was toasting its glaciers to emerge from an ice age.

Back then, Arctic sea ice was melting so rapidly it set up a temperature imbalance between the northern and southern hemispheres. That caused major transporters of atmospheric moisture—the tropical rain belt and the mid-latitude jet stream—to deviate from their previous positions and move northward for long periods, as if the planet had hitched up two belts made from water. The resulting change in rainfall patterns starved rivers in Brazil into meager streams and reduced Utah’s Lake Bonneville, once the size of Lake Michigan, into a comparable puddle.

When this grand-scale process reversed itself during the Little Ice Age—a not-quite ice age from about 1300 to 1850—severe droughts that popped up in Asia helped take down China’s Ming dynasty and Cambodia’s Khmer civilization, the researchers say.

All this is background for Broecker and Putnam’s assertion that it could all be happening again today. The Arctic’s frozen stocks of H20 are dissolving at a lightning clip, as shown by these visualizations of how much the sea ice has shrunk each year. This is the ice at its tiniest extent in 1984:

And this is its smallest extent in 2012, measuring in at about half the size it was on average from 1979 to 2000 (the ice is slightly larger in 2013 than last year):

The southern hemisphere is not keeping up with the north’s balmy temperament, the researchers say, setting up the possibility for another climate-warping temperature imbalance. Should the wind and rain belts move locations for the long-term future, the blow to humanity would be “huge,” they say. While monsoon-drenched Asia and equatorial Africa would become wetter, a paucity of moisture above the Amazon, the Middle East, and America’s western flank could create desiccated zones susceptible to droughts, crop kills, wildfires, and other yet-to-be-fathomed problems.

They add that the rain might already be migrating north, “as suggested by a number of recent droughts, including in Syria, northern China, western U.S., and northeastern Brazil.” Here’s Broecker talking about what that might mean for the coming generations:

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate