Will Humans Ever Learn to Hibernate?

The idea isn’t as crazy as you might think. Here’s why we might need hibernation to save lives and (maybe) get to the stars.

Lego cryo.<a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/pasukaru76/4032618746/sizes/o/">pasukaru76</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


You’ve probably never heard of the fat-tailed dwarf lemur, a nocturnal primate (native to Madagascar) that hops around in trees and is about the size of a rat. But these little guys are pretty closely related to humans—relative to most other life on Earth, anyway—and they are able to do something quite extraordinary. Like bears, marmots, and bats—but unlike any other primates—they hibernate (or, as some researchers put it, enter into a prolonged “period of increased torpor”) during Madagascar’s winter season. For as much as half the year, they huddle together, dramatically slow their metabolism, and (hence the name) live off of their plentiful tail fat.

This primate species, explains University of Pennsylvania professor of medicine David Casarett, may provide a roadmap for how humans themselves might someday enter a hibernationlike state. After all, despite the dramatic differences between us, we share 97 percent of our DNA with this tiny (and super cute) mammal, according to one Duke University lemur expert. “There’s hope out there, maybe, for a wonder drug, a simple injection that will reduce somebody’s metabolism by 99 percent, and put victims in a state of suspended animation,” says Casarett, author of the new book Shocked: Adventures in Bringing Back the Recently Dead, on the latest episode of the Inquiring Minds podcast.

Why would anyone want to enter a state of suspended animation? Hibernation is characterized by a slower metabolism, a decreased heart rate, slower breathing, and much colder body temperatures. And while there are several reasons why a person might want to go there, perhaps the most common one involves staving off death. People who have just been shot or injured in a car wreck, or who are having a heart attack, all share one danger: Vital organs, like the brain, are easily damaged after going just a few minutes without receiving sufficient oxygen from their bloodstream.

David Casarett Joe Chielli/Church Street Studios.

More and more evidence suggests that traditional practices of resuscitation, which may include keeping the body warm and trying to kick-start the heart (using hormones like epinephrine), can sometimes do more harm than good. Warm body temperatures and a quickly beating heart keep the organs of the body functioning at top speed, using up oxygen and other nutrients in the bloodstream. After as few as four minutes without oxygen, say from a heart attack, brain damage can set in.

So maybe we should consider putting away the epinephrine and instead encourage the body to cool down and slow its metabolism, as in hibernation, so that the organs most in danger of being irreparably harmed require less energy, and therefore less oxygen, to survive. “By cooling cells, you decrease their metabolism,” Casarett says. “You decrease the rate at which they use some of the building blocks of energy…cells also reduce the rate at which they use oxygen. And so by reducing the metabolic rate of those cells, [you] can essentially trick the body into thinking that it’s in a state of hibernation.” Casarett says that this technique holds the potential to stave off brain damage for 20 or 30 minutes—maybe even an hour.

“That would buy that victim, and his or her rescuers, enough time to be able to put that person in a safe position—get them to a hospital,” he says.

In fact, emergency medical responders and paramedics are already using ice cold saline to help preserve the lives of cardiac arrest patients. And coming up: a device called RhinoChill, that delivers a liquid coolant nasally, thereby chilling the brain.

Meanwhile, at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, researchers are now undertaking a clinical trial of what they call “emergency preservation and resuscitation,” in which cardiac arrest victims will have their blood pumped out of their bodies and replaced by cold saline, bringing their body temperature down to around 50 degrees. It already works in pigs: In one study, pigs were given fatal injuries, and then had their blood replaced with chilled saline, in effect dropping their body temperatures dramatically. Compared with a control group, pigs who were frozen and then rewarmed had much higher survival rates.

Here’s a video that explains the research further:

Outside of the medical realm, there are some far wilder reasons for wanting to hibernate. Long-distance space travel, for instance: A period of stasis extends your life, maybe long enough to take a journey that exceeds our current average human lifespan.

Baby fat-tailed dwarf lemurs David Haring, Duke Lemur Center.

Surprisingly, given these possibilities and the fairly large number of species that hibernate, scientists still don’t quite understand how hibernation works. In lemurs, a hormone called ghrelin, which is involved in feelings of alertness and hunger, is at lower levels during hibernation, explains Casarett. “There may be something about that decrease, a decreased drive to be awake and alert and eating, that might be part of the hibernation process,” he says. Switching over to humans, Cheng Chi Lee, a researcher at the University of Texas’ Medical School, is studying a molecule that goes by the name “adenosine monophosphate” (AMP), which is one of the building blocks of adenosine triphosophate (ATP), the compound that our cells use to create and store energy. Lee’s research is showing that AMP might trigger “hypometabolism,”—in other words, it slows down the rate of energy use in our cells. And AMP is ubiquitous: In Casarett’s words, this “might be able to be almost a universal way, across species, of decreasing metabolism.”

How does it work? When a molecule of AMP interacts with a molecule of ATP, it pulls off a phosphate molecule from the ATP molecule, thereby leaving the cell with less ATP. Since cells store energy in ATP, the cell then has less fuel in the tank. In his book, Casarett likens this to rising gas prices: When there is a tax on gas, people tend to conserve more. In the same way, when AMP is plentiful, cells tend to conserve energy.

There’s an extreme of all of this, to be sure. It’s called cryonics, or the idea that we might be able to freeze people for “decades or centuries” (as the Alcor Life Extension Foundation, a cryonics group, puts it) and then (hopefully) wake them up in the future. Some people today already pay large sums of money to have their heads or bodies frozen, to await a time when they might be able to be resuscitated, unfrozen and perhaps cured of whatever ails them. There are, literally, bodies preserved in liquid nitrogen, awaiting a future thaw.

But it’s a big risk. “Nobody—to my knowledge at least—has been successfully frozen and then thawed,” says Casarett. There is also a huge psychological problem: Coming back, in a vastly different era, is going to be insanely weird and disturbing. And you might be without your family, and without financial resources, although of course, would-be “cryonauts” have thought of that. “There are, I’m told, iPhone apps out there that will let you keep track—or let somebody keep track—of your stocks, and how your stocks are doing, when you’re dead,” says Casarett.

And although freezing your dead body is expensive, Alcor’s clients aren’t just the überrich. According to Casarett, some people use their life insurance policy to finance that final bath in nitrogen. So has Casarett himself signed up?

“No, I did not do that,” he says. “I can think of a lot of other charitable organizations that would probably be much more likely to use my $200,000 insurance policy in a productive way.”

To listen to the full Inquiring Minds interview with David Casarett, you can stream below:

This episode of Inquiring Minds, a podcast hosted by neuroscientist and musician Indre Viskontas and best-selling author Chris Mooney, also features a conversation with Tara Smith, an epidemiologist who is an expert on the Ebola virus, and has been debunking a large number of myths about the latest outbreak.

To catch future shows right when they are released, subscribe to Inquiring Minds via iTunes or RSS. We are also available on Stitcher. You can follow the show on Twitter at @inquiringshow and like us on Facebook. Inquiring Minds was also recently singled out as one of the “Best of 2013” on iTunes—you can learn more here.


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate