How to Beat the Drought by Hoarding Water (If It Ever Rains Again)

Harvesting rainwater is easy—in theory.

Shutterstock/<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-228783475/stock-photo-boy.html?src=bsC6cGiSRGLo0ESMzP_ndg-1-6">Here</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Rainwater harvesting sounds simple, right? People have been setting out containers to catch rain for thousands of years, but collecting rainwater in our thirsty modern world is a messy business. Here’s what you need to know if you’re hoping to stick a bucket under a gutter to conserve water and cut down your water bill.

Why should I collect rainwater? Rainwater can be used for just about anything—from watering plants and flushing toilets to drinking and cooking. With many states facing a serious drought and some areas enacting water-use rules, water conservation has become a popular motive for collecting rainwater. In some rural areas where groundwater is drying up, rainwater catchment has become a necessity.

In urban environments, most rainwater is lost: Only 15 percent of storm water reenters the ground on developed landscapes (as opposed to 50 percent on natural landscapes). The rest runs off or evaporates. A 2,500-square-foot roof can harvest around 1,500 gallons of water from an inch of rainfall, enough to supply a four-person household for four days. By that formula, a similarly sized roof in the San Francisco Bay Area, where it rains almost 24 inches a year (usually), could collect a 100-day supply of water.

Not surprisingly, sellers of rainwater catchment systems are seeing increased interest in dry states. Jesse Froehlich, founder and owner of BlueBarrel Rainwater Catchment Systems, says she has seen an uptick in business over the past year or so. “The drought has raised a lot of people’s consciousness about conserving water and the benefits of rainwater catchment,” she says. Mark Pape, a board member of the American Rainwater Catchment Systems Association and an investor in Rain Harvesting Supplies, says the company’s business has doubled during the last couple of years.

What’s the best way to collect rainwater? Rainwater catchment systems can range from a couple of 55-gallon barrels in the backyard to industrial-scale cisterns that can supply an entire building. But barrels will only get you so far. If you want to use rainwater for flushing toilets or washing clothes, you’ll need a much more complex system. Pape’s company’s systems include 30,000-gallon cisterns, pumps, gauges, and filters, and they can cost anywhere from $5,000 to $15,000 for a single household.

Wait, I heard it’s illegal to harvest rainwater. In every state but Colorado, you can install barrels under your gutters without permits or professional installers, as long as you only use the water outdoors. Colorado lawmakers recently made news when they failed to pass a bill that would allow homeowners to install two 55-gallon rain barrels on their property. The bill failed because of long-standing rules that guarantee the water coming down from the sky to the holders of downstream water rights.

Most states’ rainwater catchment laws are not so strict. While some states like Utah limit the amount of rainwater you can harvest, most states, especially in the drought-ridden Southwest and West, allow and even encourage residents to collect all they can. Albuquerque’s water authority recently began an initiative to install free rainwater catchment systems to see how much water it can save. Other states and cities across the country have also introduced incentives for rainwater harvesting. Tucson, San Diego, Austin, Seattle, and other cities have rebate programs for rainwater catchment installation, and Texas grants a property tax exemption to residents who install rainwater catchment systems.

Shutterstock/dmitrymoi

What if I want something fancier than a couple of rain barrels? Beyond basic rainwater collection, you’ll have to check the law. While about a dozen states have laws that define rainwater catchment practices, most don’t. If no state law exists, you’ll have to defer to local laws. There are two major plumbing codes in the United States, but only one has a section on installing rainwater catchment systems. So if your local code doesn’t mention rainwater catchment, you may have to apply for a waiver, and if that doesn’t work, you may be out of luck.

Even if your municipality does allow rainwater catchment, you might have to ask public health officials to approve your system if it connects to your plumbing. (If the system loses pressure, the water in your barrels could flow into city water pipes.) Many health inspectors are unfamiliar with rainwater harvesting and may not approve permits for rainwater harvesting systems, according to Neal Shapiro, a longtime rainwater harvesting advocate who leads the watershed management program in the Office of Sustainability and the Environment in Santa Monica, California.

How big could rainwater catchment get? Perhaps the biggest impediment for rainwater harvesting is the cost. Large-scale rainwater catchment systems remain pricey and municipal water remains very cheap. When you factor in the cost of the collection system, harvested rainwater can cost anywhere from 75 cents to a few dollars per gallon, while municipal water in most areas is as cheap as a fraction of a cent per gallon.* Furthermore, cisterns require a lot of space, which can be hard to come by in dense urban areas.

But as the drought drags on in Western states, the cost of municipal water is increasing, creating new incentives to scoop up rainwater. Last year California voters approved Proposition 1, which will allocate state funds for rainwater harvesting. Some cities have revised their building codes to require new construction to catch rainwater and reuse it on site, including Santa Monica and San Francisco, which recently required large buildings and commercial developments to use recycled water for irrigation and toilet flushing. Most ambitious of all, Los Angeles is developing a plan to harvest rainwater on a large scale by installing cisterns and massive basins around the San Fernando Valley.

Now all we need is some rain.

Correction: An earlier version of this article misstated the typical cost of municipal water.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate