10 Surprising Snacks That May Have BPA

We didn’t know how much of our food may have it, until now.

Certain packages of peanut butter, such as Jif's 4-pound container (not pictured), made the list. So did other popular snacks. NoDerog/iStock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Bisphenol A may very well be the Donald Trump of the chemical world: it’s divisive, no one can agree how much we can safely be exposed to, and it’s everywhere.

Frequently used in food packaging and plastics, BPA has been linked to reproductive toxicity, cancer, and other serious health disorders. The FDA says that the risk of exposure to BPA from packaged foods is low and does not compromise consumer safety. But several states have passed legislation banning its use in reusable food and drink containers, and manufacturers are no longer allowed to use BPA-based materials in baby bottlessippy cups, and infant formula packaging nationwide. Despite years of attracting national headlines, the chemical’s prevalence in common food items and packaging was largely unknown—until now. 

Last month, in response to California legislation passed in 2015, the Grocery Manufacturers Association created a database of food and beverage products with packaging that could expose consumers to the hormone-disrupting chemical. Ongoing studies have yet to determine just how much BPA each item might contain, but the sheer size of the list of products that could be affected is staggering: nearly 12,000 snacks, drinks, and alcoholic beverages are on it.

The Environmental Working Group, a research and advocacy organization, analyzed the food and beverage industry’s data and found an additional 4,000 products that may contain BPA.

Some manufacturers specified which product containers may contain BPA, others did not. Here are 10 common household snacks on the list:

  • Cool Whip Topping, aerosol cans
  • Hershey’s Special Dark Fudge Topping
  • Jif Creamy and Crunchy Peanut Butter, 4-pound containers
  • Mott’s Apple Sauce, containers with metal and plastic lids
  • Nabisco Easy Cheese, spray can
  • Pabst Blue Ribbon Lager
  • Simply Tostitos Organic Chunky Salsa
  • Smucker’s Natural Fruit Spread
  • Starbucks Frappuccino Chilled Coffee
  • Trader Joe’s Kosher Dill Pickles

Earlier this year, Campbell Soup Company announced its plan to phase out cans containing BPA by 2017, but the alternatives may not be any better. Meanwhile public and environmental health advocates continue to petition for nationwide legislation that establishes what level of BPA is safe for consumers to be exposed to and laws that would require BPA to be disclosed on product labels. A comprehensive searchable list of items whose packaging might expose consumers to BPA is available at the EWG website.

This article has been updated.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate