What to Do When Russian Commandos Seize Your Ship

The French government blew up his ship. The Russian government threw him in jail. But this Greenpeace captain isn’t backing down.

Denis Sinyakov/Greenpeace


They rappelled from helicopters onto the ship. They showed their weapons before locking the captain and his crew inside the cabins. The intruders looked around, pillaged the crew’s booze, and started drinking. What began as a terrifying attack slowly turned into a rowdy encounter with intoxicated Russian commandos.

Russian special forces seized a Greenpeace ship in the Arctic Circle in September 2013. Greenpeace was there to protest Russian oil drilling. Denis Sinyakov/Greenpeace

That’s just one story told by Peter Willcox, a Greenpeace ship captain, on this week’s episode of the Inquiring Minds podcast. Willcox’s vessel, the Arctic Sunrise, was seized in the Arctic by Russia’s Federal Security Service in 2013. What followed was a four-day tow back to shore, an arrest on charges of piracy, and a hard time in one of Europe’s oldest prisons.

“We were told we would get 10 to 15 years and we better start learning Russian,” Willcox tells host Indre Viskontas. Ultimately, the piracy charges were swapped for less-serious sentences for hooliganism. Willcox and his 27 crew members, along with two journalists, ultimately spent more than two months in custody. Their arrest and imprisonment gained international media attention.

Photo courtesy Tom Jefferson/Greenpeace

Greenpeace has been using dramatic, nonviolent actions in pursuit of its environmentalist mission since the 1970s. The situation in the Arctic three years ago was no different. The activists’ goal was to hang a banner near the steel sides of a Russian oil rig to protest the country’s drilling practices. So-called “banner actions” aren’t Willcox’s protest of choice: He prefers missions that are more straightforward (like the time he chained himself to a harpoon gun). Although Willcox and his crew had done something similar in the Arctic one year prior, in 2013 things got serious.

“They fired shots across our bow,” recounts Willcox. “We weren’t going away, and they flew out with a helicopter…and took over the ship.” As Russian special forces were towing Willcox and his crew to shore, all he could think, he recalls, was: “It’s another day at the office.”

Willcox clearly has no love for Russia’s criminal justice system. A trial, he says, “is pretty much a rubber stamp,” a mere formality in a system in which most of those detained are found guilty. Still, he takes the opportunity to criticize his own country as well. “Whenever I describe the Russian judicial system…I have to point out that here in the US we incarcerate over double the per capita population rate they do in Russia,” he says. “I think our judicial system, where poor people are forced into copping a plea and not having a trial, is nothing to smile at either.” (According to the Institute for Criminal Policy Research, per capita incarceration rates in the United States are roughly 50 percent higher than in Russia.)

Like any sailor, Willcox is full of stories, and he shares some of his most dramatic—and often heartbreaking—tales on Inquiring Minds. In 1985, for example, French spies blew up his ship as it sat peacefully in dock. A photographer was killed, and the vessel sank. The ship, the Rainbow Warrior, was on its way to French Polynesia, where the Greenpeace crew planned to protest nuclear testing in the Pacific.

You can listen to the full interview below.

Willcox’s accounts are riveting, but these days, there’s another—less headline-grabbing—side to his organization’s work.

“Now when we attack a problem, it’s not just a matter of going out and doing an action against it,” Willcox says. “Now it’s also lobbying, it’s also helping to write laws, it’s also doing research, it’s also publicity. It’s a whole gamut in order to affect the problem from all sides.”

You can find more of Willcox’s stories in his book Greenpeace Captain: My Adventures in Protecting the Future of Our Planet, which came out last April.

Inquiring Minds is a podcast hosted by neuroscientist and musician Indre Viskontas and Kishore Hari, the director of the Bay Area Science Festival. To catch future shows right when they are released, subscribe to Inquiring Minds via iTunes or RSS. You can follow the show on Twitter at @inquiringshow and like us on Facebook.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate