Should Southern California Be Shaken by the Recent Quake Warning?

Here’s what you need to know about last week’s earthquake swarm.

The Salton Sea was the epicenter of last week's earthquakes. <a href=http://www.istockphoto.com/photo/coachella-valley-gm502978294-82099871?st=_p_salton%20sea>jewhyte</a>/iStock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Last week, a swarm of 200 small earthquakes rumbled under the Salton Sea, a saline lake in Southern California. Although only three of the quakes measured above 4.0 on the Richter scale, seismologists worry that these temblors may portend a more dramatic earthquake to come.

So is The Big One coming any day? Here are a few things you need to know about the recent seismic activity:

What is the Salton Sea, anyway?

The Salton Sea is a shallow, saltwater lake east of San Diego, right on the San Andreas fault. Last week’s quakes were not the first in the area: In 2001 and 2009 a swarm of small quakes shook the lake. But the recent temblors were the largest since seismologists started measuring in the region. Scientists worry more about the location than the size, as quakes in the Salton Sea can trigger rumbles elsewhere on the fault.

Graphic via LA Times

“When there’s significant seismicity in this area of the fault, we kind of wonder if it is somehow going to go active,” Caltech seismologist Egill Hauksson told the Los Angeles Times. “So maybe one of those small earthquakes that’s happening in the neighborhood of the fault is going to trigger it, and set off the big event.”

What would “the big one” look like?

Scientists predict that when the San Andreas fault has its next big shake up, shocks will be felt as far as Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, and Bakersfield. The quake would likely spur thousands of wildfires; the destruction of brick, concrete, and even some steel buildings; and could result in a death toll as high as 1,800. And the estimates aren’t science fiction. According to Donald Drysdale, spokesperson for the California Geological Survey, there is a 93 percent probability of an earthquake of magnitude 6.7 or greater in Southern California before 2037. And for the whole state the percentage is 99.

So how worried should Southern California be right now?

After the Salton Sea quakes, the risk of “the big one” hitting was elevated to 1 in 500, about 100 times the average odds, according to the US Geological Survey. But as time passes since last week’s shakes, odds are shrinking back to normal levels. Scientists estimate that starting Tuesday, odds of a magnitude 7 earthquake hitting Southern California will decrease again to 1 in 10,000. Seismologist Lucy Jones tweeted about the activity, saying while risk was decreasing, it is still important to prepare.

Could the drought be triggering earthquakes?

Maybe. According to research published in Nature by geologist Colin Amos of Western Washington University, the vast amount of recent groundwater extraction in the agriculturally productive San Joaquin Valley could actually be contributing to earthquakes along the San Andreas fault. The reason: Water is heavy, and when it’s removed in great volumes, tectonic plates deep beneath the aquifer can move more freely.

Is there such thing as “earthquake weather?

The theories of weather predicting earthquakes date back to Aristotle, who first professed that earthquakes were caused by wind trapped in subterranean caves. Hot, dry air that’s particularly calm is often called “earthquake weather” and is thought to be followed by a major temblors. But it’s actually just a myth, one that the US Geological Survey writes off. Earthquakes actually occur equally as often in hot, rainy, and cold weather, so there’s no need to spend a nice warm California day freaking out about quakes (any more than usual, that is). 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate