How Your Cup of Tea Explains the Universe

Your mug holds the key to understanding the oceans, the weather, and even earthquake safety.

Tea=MC2Itsmesimon/iStock


For physicist Helen Czerski, understanding the seemingly complex scientific phenomena that govern the universe begins with a teacup. Stir milk into your coffee or tea and you will notice the fluids gradually mix by swirling—rather than simply merging. Such a simple and mundane observation can also be used to explain much larger patterns in the world, from the churning of the ocean to the formation of a hurricane. In every instance, two fluids meeting for the first time create swirling motions to combine.

In her new book Storm in a Teacup: The Physics of Everyday Life, Czerski uses examples like these to provide a playful and familiar lens through which laymen can explore the world around us.

“People see physics as being either quantum tiny weird things or massive cosmological stuff, and actually, there’s all this stuff in the middle which is still how the universe works,” Czerski tells Kishore Hari on this week’s episode of the Inquiring Minds podcast. “And a lot of these little things are things that people have seen but haven’t noticed.”

On Inquiring Minds, Czerski walks listeners through a handful of these “little things” described in her book. A brimming teacup, for example, can also be used to explain the concept of resonant frequency. Tea drinkers who frequently spill their tea on themselves may notice that tea in an espresso cup sloshes much faster than tea in a giant mug. That’s because the natural sloshing rate relates to the size of the cup. And if said cup is perturbed at the same rate as its natural sloshing rate (or resonant frequency), the tea will slosh higher and higher until it spills over the edge. This knowledge can be pretty useful for cup design—coincidentally, the rate of human walking corresponds quite well with the natural sloshing rate of an average-size cup, which is why you may often find yourself spilling tea as you walk.

Physics is “fundamentally democratic,” says Czerski. “You don’t need a particle accelerator or a posh lab or a white coat to see the fundamental rules of the world at work.”

It can be used to understand more important things, too—such as why buildings of a certain height are more susceptible to earthquakes of a particular magnitude. Czerski brings up the 1985 earthquake in Mexico City as an example: Engineers analyzing the aftermath of the quake noticed that many of the buildings between five and 20 stories high had fallen down, whereas many of the buildings that topped out below five stories or above 20 stories were fine. Just as mugs have a sloshing rate related to their diameter, buildings have a swaying rate related to their height; the earthquake happened to match the resonant frequency of buildings between five and 20 stories, making them sway more vigorously until they collapsed.

“Physicists fundamentally—they look for patterns,” explains Czerski. “And when you see a pattern in one place, it becomes a tool to use in lots of others.”

As an experimental physicist who loves poking and prodding the world to see how it responds, Czerski hopes her book will inspire other people to do the same. “All of these little important tools allow you to be a better citizen because it’s not about knowing all the answers at all, it’s being able to ask the right questions.” The brilliant thing is, the laws of physics are “fundamentally democratic, and you don’t need a particle accelerator or a posh lab or a white coat to see the fundamental rules of the world at work.”

Czerski admits that she sometimes receives pushback from others in the scientific community over her playful approach, but she doesn’t find her examples frivolous. “I don’t think these little everyday things are trivial,” she says. “They are absolutely not. They contain the heart of the framework that rules our world.”

Inquiring Minds is a podcast hosted by neuroscientist and musician Indre Viskontas and Kishore Hari, the director of the Bay Area Science Festival. To catch future shows right when they are released, subscribe to Inquiring Minds via iTunes or RSS. You can follow the show on Twitter at @inquiringshow and like us on Facebook.


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.
More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate