“You Can’t Get Animals to Do Retakes”

Behind the scenes of Planet Earth II’s most arduous shoots.

Photo courtesty BBC America

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Zavodovski is a 9.6-square-mile uninhabited volcanic island off the coast of Antarctica. Well, uninhabited by humans: The island, discovered on Christmas Eve in 1819 by Russian explorers, is home to the world’s largest penguin colony. The chinstrap penguins’ eating habits and romantic mating rituals are documented in ultra high definition in “Islands,” the first episode of Planet Earth II, which premiers in the United States on BBC America on February 18. 

The shoot on Zavodovski was arguably the season’s most difficult because of the island’s remoteness, says British filmmaker Elizabeth White, who was in charge of the mission. She and the crew spent seven days at sea to get there, and two weeks up close and personal with more than 1.5 million penguins. I caught up with White to hear more about filming with drones, that viral baby iguana video, and what a crew eats while working on a deserted island.

Planet Earth II producer Elizabeth White Photo courtesy BBC America

Mother Jones: What made the shoot on Zavodovski so difficult?

Elizabeth White: The island is so very remote. About tens of people, not even hundreds, have ever visited. It has no infrastructure for visitors, so we started preparing a year and a half in advance. We had to make sure we were be able to work in a way that was not going to impact the wildlife. We also had to organize all the health and safety kits, tents and camping equipment, medical supplies, camera equipment, and figure out how much water and how much food we were going to need.

MJ: What does everyone in the film crew eat while working in such remote locations?

EW: Well we didn’t know how much water we’d have, so we opted for boil-in-the-bag food. You can literally take salt water and put these bags in the water and boil them to warm them through. We had to take enough of those meals to make sure everybody had one hot meal every day.

Lunch was loads of fatty things like cheese, butter, biscuits, tins of fish, and food with lots of protein. We ate four kilos of cheese between four of us in two weeks! Chocolate bars as well, you need those to get through. We probably weren’t having enough calories every day, but we were only there for two weeks.

Planet Earth II‘s film crew was able to capture chinstrap penguins from many angles by using drones. Photo courtesy BBC America

MJ: Drones have certainly changed the way you can film habitats. Do the animals react to them? Are they scared of drones?

EW: Obviously we want to film animals in a way where they’re not freaked out; we want to get natural behaviors. You have to choose your subjects. It was quite a new thing to fly drones on Zavodovski, they’ve never been flown there before. On the island the penguins worry about skuas flying overhead; they get quite freaked out. We made a conscious effort to make sure we were always flying above the height of the predators and then the penguins paid no attention. But penguin colonies are hugely noisy places, so once the drone was up in the air, you couldn’t hear it.

MJ: How gory can you get with the scenes while still being educational?

EW: There’s a gut feeling: You want to show the biology, the behavior, but we don’t revel in showing the gore. For example with the marine iguanas, it can take a long time for the snakes to find them. Once the story is there and the animal is caught, there’s little point to reveling in that. It’s about the sensitivity of watching and thinking, “Okay that’s enough.”

MJ: How many cuts did it take to make the chase scene of the baby iguana on the Galapagos Islands? It’s not all the same iguana, is it?

EW: We were filming that story for 12 days, waiting and concentrating for baby iguanas to come out of the sand. Sometimes the snake would grab the iguana really quickly and we’d miss it. You can’t get animals to do retakes; you’re filming everything from a distance. In the end it’s about sifting through and finding the best moments.

MJ: What’s been the most amazing shot that “got away”?

EW: If you watch the sequence with the marine iguanas you’ll notice there are moments where some shots are really borderline in focus, but the behavior and the drama is such that we decided to include them. Also the scene of the crabs and crazy ants: We took three shoots to try to film that story. It was the year of El Niño and there were certain stories that were hard to get because of the environmental conditions. You can’t get back a shot you missed so you try to forget them.

Christmas Island red crabs migrate to lay eggs in the sea. An estimated 10 million to 15 million crabs have died off since humans brought the yellow crazy ant to the island. Photo courtesy BBC America

MJ: So much climate change stuff might not have been included in the first season 10 years ago—how has that discussion changed since?

EW: This series is so much a portrait of different habitats, it would be wrong to show the habitats without talking about some of the issues they’re facing. For “Islands,” I felt strongly that we needed to have an invasive-species story and that’s why we have the red crabs and the crazy ants. The statistic for extinction on islands is quite frightening.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate