A Painful (But Pretty Funny) Irony About California’s New Climate Offensive in China

Suspicion is not far beneath the surface.

Ng Han Guan/AP Photo

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Tuesday, I published a story about California’s governor Jerry Brown vacuuming up climate deals in China in an attempt to fill the void in American leadership on climate change left by the Trump administration. Brown has been on a multi-city tour of China, the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, to promote Golden State know-how, meet ministers, and ink multiple deals.

Overnight, I received an email from Harvard-trained analyst Ella Chou, who focuses on China with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, a top government energy research lab in Denver, and was in the room with Jerry Brown in Beijing during an event this week. I had asked Chou what she thought California’s appeal was for China, and if a single state could exert as much pressure over China’s party leadership as could, say, a fully engaged national government.

Her full response is worth reading for insights into what’s next in the US-China climate relationship. Note the painful irony of some Chinese people being suspicious of US actions, given President Trump’s now-famous Tweet calling global warming a Chinese hoax to kill US manufacturing, and his false claim that the Paris agreement allows China to get away with doing nothing. Here is what she wrote, with my emphasis added:

China has an interesting obsession about California. It may be because of its large Asian population, the Silicon Valley wonders, or the Hollywood glamour. Either way, California is definitely one of the first places China looks to for inspiration and role model in terms of clean energy transition.
 
I think what California does best is “leading by doing.” In that aspect, I think it has been doing a great job by setting high ambitions, encouraging innovations, and welcoming bilateral exchanges. I’m not sure if it would be wise or effective for California to take a more “pushing” or “coercing” approach. There is no shortage of skeptics or conspiracy theorists in China: Once the intention becomes too clear, it may backfire and lead those folks to say “climate change is a U.S. hoax for China to do more and slow down its economic development, while U.S. is doing nothing.” 
 
Part of what we are currently doing in China is to point them to California and subnational efforts, by the state, private sector, NGOs, research institutes, to say, “Hey, even though our President is pulling out of Paris, there’s a lot of going on still in the U.S., so you guys shouldn’t sit back and be idle.”
 
My sense is that the climate leadership is now falling on the Europeans (Germans and Danes are particularly active in this space in China), however, the Chinese leaders know that they need to make a lot of efforts on climate, environment, and energy regardless of what U.S. federal government is doing, so I’m expecting them to gradually take a more leadership role in that as well.
Lest you forget:

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate