Dreaming of a White Christmas? America’s 6 Craziest Holiday Snowstorms.

Tons of snow, 34-foot waves, thunder, lightning, and paralyzed cities.

Larry Levine/AP

This story was originally published by Newsweek and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

Snow can turn Christmastime into the magical, winter holiday you might be hoping for. But so far this week, it appears much of the country will miss a white Christmas—though some storms are in store for the weekend. 

But a look at past blizzards in the U.S. reveals how people have experienced intense snowfall that halted cities and airports, buried cars and even caused 34-foot waves on coastlines. Many of these historic storms arrived just in time for the holidays. These are just a few memorable Christmas snowstorms: 

December 25-28, 1969

The winter of 1969 saw tons of snow in the Northeast. By the 22nd, a foot of snow had already fallen, but another storm system was moving along the East coast on Christmas night. Another 15 inches fell near Albany, New York, and up to 44 inches buried parts of Vermont. Some streets weren’t cleared for three to four weeks in Albany, according to the weather service. That month still remains Albany’s snowiest month on record—in addition, the same month saw a record-low temperature of 22 degrees below zero Fahrenheit.

December 24-25, 1982

Another Christmas Eve snowstorm dumped nearly 24 inches of snow in Denver, Colorado, according to the Denver PostStreets were lined with snow-buried cars. Thousands were stranded at the Stapleton International Airport on Christmas night. The 1982 blizzard holds Denver’s record for most snow ever recorded on the ground—though a more recent snowstorm in 2007 holds the record for greatest snowfall on Christmas Day, at nearly 8 inches.

December 22-24, 1989

North Carolina’s coastline saw a massive snowstorm back in 1989. The offshore storm system blasted 60 mile-per-hour winds and 34-foot-high waves in the near-shore waters, according to the weather service. Snowfall totals were around 15 inches in Wilmington and temperatures plummeted to zero degrees on Christmas morning. Wind gusts piled snow four to eight feet high along the coast. Jacksonville, Florida reached 5 degrees below zero. It was the first white Christmas on record for northeastern Florida to North Carolina—and traffic accidents on icy roads caused several fatalities. 

December 24-25, 2004

The “Great Christmas Eve Snow Storm” of 2004 blanketed southeast Texas ranging from one to 13 inches across the region. An Arctic cold front had blasted cold air to the area, making it the perfect environment for a snowstorm. The “depth” of cold air in the atmosphere of southeast Texas is typically much shallower than it was that Christmas Eve morning, which makes freezing rain or sleet more common than snow. The record-breaking storm resulted in the first white Christmas for some Texans, according to the National Weather Service

December 23-27, 2009

The “Christmas Blizzard of 2009” raged over south central Nebraska and northern Kansas for 18 to 24 hours straight—with 30- to 60-mile-per-hour winds creating frequent “white-out” conditions. Nearly 8 inches of snow was recorded at the Central Nebraska Regional Airport at Grand Island on Christmas Day—which broke the record of 3 inches of snow in 1941. Hastings, Nebraska recorded over 9 inches at a weather service office that year, breaking the previous record from 1945.

December 26-27, 2010 

This blizzard wasn’t quite a white Christmas—but East Coasters got their share of snow the day after. Over 7,000 flights were halted, and this strange snowstorm was accompanied with thunder and lightning, according to the History Channel. Rahway, New Jersey got the most snow, 32 inches to be exact. The snow dragged New York City to a halt that year. Even the former Mayor Michael Bloomberg acknowledged the 911 emergency systems had been “overwhelmed” and took blame for the poor response, reported the New York TimesThe nor’easter brought with it gusts of 60 mile-per-hour winds.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate