The Racial Inequality in Cancer Deaths

Overall death rates keep dropping, but black Americans are still more likely to die than whites.

Jessica Tezak/ The Evansville Courier & Press via AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

More than one-third of all men and women in the US will develop cancer during their lifetimes, but not every cancer diagnosis is an immediate death sentence. For more than two decades, the rate of Americans dying from cancer has dropped every year. However, according to an annual report from the American Cancer Society released Thursday, many young and middle-aged black Americans are not reaping equal benefits from improved cancer prevention, detection, and treatment.

“While we are making all of these advances, I think we can all recognize that we can still do a lot better,” said Dr. L. Michelle Bennett, director of the Center for Research Strategy at the National Cancer Institute, who was not involved with the report. “All of these advances are not reaching everybody equally.”

From 2014 to 2015, the U.S. cancer death rate dropped by 1.7 percent, mostly driven by decreasing death rates for lung, breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. The decline follows a trend that began in 1991, resulting in nearly 2.4 million fewer cancer deaths in the years since. The report points to several reasons behind the improving mortality rate, including reductions in smoking and advances in early detection and treatment.

Though the racial gap in cancer deaths continues to narrow as well, this mainly reflects progress for older age groups, which masks “stark persistent inequalities for young and middle-aged black Americans,” the report says. Overall, the cancer death rate in 2015 was 14 percent higher for non-Hispanic blacks than for non-Hispanic whites, down from a peak of 33 percent in 1993. Yet, while the gap narrowed to 7 percent in those 65 or older, for those younger than 65, mortality rates were 31 percent higher for blacks than for whites, with much larger disparities in many states.

The smaller gap for the older black population is partly due to universal health care access for seniors through Medicare, says Ahmedin Jemal, vice president of the Surveillance and Health Services Research Program at the American Cancer Society and a co-author on the report. On the other hand, lack of insurance among younger black Americans may contribute to their higher mortality rate compared to whites.

“We know that insurance is a gateway to accessing care,” Jemal said, and therefor improving access can reduce the racial gap. In Delaware, for example, paying for screenings and treatment for the uninsured helped to drastically reduce colorectal cancer mortality rates and shrink the gap between blacks and whites.

Researchers agree, however, that the reasons behind racial disparities in cancer deaths are multi-pronged and still not fully understood. They involve the interplay of genetics, lifestyle, and environment, as well as access to health care, Bennett said, noting “We really need more studies, large studies, that really comprehensively examine how these factors come together.”

Some states in the report, such as New York and Massachusetts, have seen the racial mortality gap disappear for whites and blacks over 65. “This is encouraging because it means messages about screening and early detection have been heard,” said Linda Goler Blount, president and CEO of the Black Women’s Health Imperative. Those shrinking gaps suggest minorities “are taking advantage of preventive services like screening mammography and colonoscopy, have reduced smoking and, for those over 65, are receiving quality care,” she said.

One area of concern exemplifying the racial mortality gap can be seen in outcomes for breast cancer. Although African-American women develop breast cancer at similar or slightly lower rates, they are more likely to die from the disease compared with white women, according to the American Cancer Society’s facts and figures on African Americans and cancer.

“Black women get breast cancer, on average, five to seven years younger than white women, so our cancers are detected later, and when they’re more advanced,” Goler Blount said. She also explained that younger black women are more likely to have an aggressive form of breast cancer known as triple negative, a much more difficult to treat subtype of cancer that develops nearly two times as often in black women. The NCI is undertaking its largest-ever study on the topic to delve into how genetic and biological factors contribute to risk.

Again, access to health care appears to play an important role. Jemal coauthored a study of women with breast cancer from 2004 to 2013 that found being uninsured accounted for more than one-third of the higher death rate for black women.

The good news, Goler Blount said, is more than 90 percent of black women are now insured following the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. “If this trend continues and black women continue to be insured, have access to preventive health care and quality treatment when diagnosed with cancer,” she says, “we can expect the gap in deaths due to cancer compared with whites to decrease.”

As a whole, the new ACS report highlights that more can be done to prevent cancer in the first place, for instance by further reducing smoking, which still accounts for nearly three out of every ten cancer deaths.

Screen Shot 2018-01-04 at 1.16.57 PM

In 2018, 1,735,350 new cancer cases and 609,640 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the U.S., the report found.

“If we, the cancer community, could do a better job of implementing those things we already know work,” Bennett said, “many, many lives could be saved.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate