Donald Trump Might Be Making Climate Denial More Popular

Here’s what a new Gallup poll reveals.

evgovorov/iStock / Getty Images

Are Republicans going in a more extreme, inflexible direction on climate change under Donald Trump?
The new results from Gallup’s 2018 March survey on American attitudes on global warming suggest he might be having a polarizing effect.

Gallup has conducted annual surveys on American opinion on global warming for at least 20 years. Year-to-year, there isn’t much change in what Americans think, with majorities saying global warming is occurring and a result of human activity. But after two years of steadily increasing majorities, averages are slightly down in most categories, most likely because attitudes towards climate change have only become more politically polarized after Trump took office. 

According to Gallup, compared to last year, in 2018 Republicans are slightly more likely to think the seriousness of the issue is exaggerated (up 3 points). Fewer say scientists agree global warming is occurring  (down by 11 points to 42 percent) and are a result of human activity (down 5 points to 35 percent). These aren’t huge swings, but perhaps a sign that rank-and-file voters have taken their cues from party leaders: Trump has insisted that climate change is a hoax, and he’s spent the past year undermining trust in the media and repeating false claims about the global Paris climate agreement. He tweeted this winter:

A majority of Independents agree global warming is occurring and that they’re seeing the effects, but their numbers are also slightly down from a year ago, and may account for some of the overall drop. 

Meanwhile, Democratic leaders have grown more comfortable talking about the effects climate change. They are more likely to say they’re already seeing the effects of global warming (a jump of 9 points to 82 percent in 2018), and more Democrats (67 percent) than in the past believe this is a serious threat in their lifetimes. Fewer Democrats believe news on climate change is exaggerated.

Another way to gauge how views on global warming have shifted the past 20 years is by looking at the three groups Gallup refers to as “the concerned believers,” “mixed middle,” and “cool skeptics.” The number of people in the mixed middle, meaning people who agree global warming is occurring but are unsure it poses a serious threat in their lifetimes, has dropped significantly since 2001, as public awareness and the science have advanced. The “cool skeptics,” which includes people who think climate change is a natural phenomenon without human influence, has remained more or less consistent.

To see real movement in climate change partisanship, the country probably needs to see more of a shift in that “mixed middle” category. With Republican climate change skepticism calcifying in the Trump era, there’s a long way to go.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate