Solar Energy Set a Global Record Last Year, Mostly Thanks to China

In an unprecedented boom, China installed 53 gigawatts of solar technology.

Hu Yongzhang cleans the solar panel on the roof of his house in China's Shandong Province, Dec. 24, 2017.Dong Naide/Xinhua/ZUMA

A new report shows that last year the world moved away from relying on fossil fuels and toward replacing them with renewable energy—solar energy in particular.

Solar power “rose to record prominence” in 2017, according to the Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment report released Thursday by United Nations Environment, the Frankfurt School-UNEP Collaborating Centre, and Bloomberg New Energy Finance. While adoption of renewable energy grew overall—and skyrocketed in China—investment from big markets like the US, the United Kingdom, and Germany dropped off.

In 2017, the world installed an unprecedented amount of solar energy technology—98 gigawatts—more than the net addition of all coal, gas, and nuclear power plants combined. Solar power also attracted far more dollars than any other type of energy—$160.8 billion, up 18 percent from the year before. Investment in new coal and gas projects generated about $103 billion.

Angus McCrone, chief editor of Bloomberg New Energy Finance and lead author of the report, says the worldwide spike in solar energy is remarkable. “It’s pretty amazing when you think that solar, only 10 years ago, was a very small piece,” he says, noting that in 2007, less than 3 gigawatts of solar energy projects were installed globally.

In the US, the numbers on renewable energy are not quite as bright. The report shows US investment dropped 6 percent last year to $40.5 billion, though McCrone cautions that the drop is not big enough to signal a major trend change. Nearly 9 out of 10 Americans support expanding solar power, according to a 2016 Pew Research Center survey, while a majority oppose expanding offshore drilling, nuclear power, fracking, and coal mining.

In 2017, the number of solar industry jobs in the US decreased for the first time in seven years. And earlier this year, the Trump administration imposed a new tariff on solar panels. The Solar Energy Industry Association estimates the tariff will cause the loss of 23,000 US jobs in 2018. “For solar, a trade war is going to play out differently than other industries,” says Samantha Gross, a foreign policy, energy security, and climate initiative fellow at the Brookings Institution. “Unlike in other industries where you would see a lot of trade move around, I think [solar] companies will suck it up and pay the tariffs.”

China’s solar boom led the global surge last year. China created more than half of all new global solar capacity, and accounted for 45 percent of the $279.8 billion spent worldwide on all renewables. Gross explains that China’s growth is driven by the country’s own solar manufacturing, climbing energy needs, ambitious plans addressing climate change, and pollution problems. “China has a growing power demand to serve,” she says. “China also has horrendous local air pollution problems. I don’t want to belittle their climate commitment, but it’s easier for them to build up their renewable energy industry when they are also helping with a more tangible problem. ”

Other developing markets, such as those in Mexico, the United Arab Emirates, and Egypt, also saw a jump in renewable energy investment. Meanwhile, investment declined in more mature renewable energy markets, including in the United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan. The amount of money a country invests in renewable energy “depends a lot on what government support is available,” McCrone explains. For example, the United Kingdom and Germany recently saw shifts in government support—in the case of the UK, the end of some subsidies—and a big fall in investment. And in the future, more countries are likely to move away from government subsidies. “Before long…many projects will have to sink or swim without any government-backed price support,” the report says.

Overall, a record 157 gigawatts of renewable power were commissioned worldwide last year. (Large hydropower was excluded from the renewables analysis.) Although global renewable energy investment was up 2 percent from 2016, it was still 13 percent below the record set in 2015. McCrone notes, however, that costs have dropped significantly in the past two years, and continue to fall. So while the world spent more money on renewables in 2015, it actually generated more renewable energy in 2017. 

Since 2004, renewable energy investment has reached a total of $2.9 trillion, and renewable energy now accounts for about 12 percent of all global power.

The amount of electricity generated by renewables is equivalent to avoiding about 1.8 gigatons of carbon dioxide emissions, roughly equal to the amount of CO2 emitted by the entire US transport system.

Last year, carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere reached 406.5 parts per million, up 2.3 ppm from the previous year, and 2017 was the second hottest on record, behind only the previous year. That fall, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt announced a proposal to end the Clean Power Plan, an Obama-era policy to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.  

Erik Solheim, head of UN Environment, says he is confident that US renewable energy investment will continue because industry decisions will “not be decided by politics, but by the market.” The new report sends a strong message to consumers and investors that solar energy is here to stay, he says. “It shows that solar can take on fossil fuels,” Solheim says. “Solar can compete.”

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate