Researchers Just Made a Disturbing Discovery About Your Child’s Schizophrenia Risk

Sometimes, it can begin in the womb.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

For decades, researchers have observed that people whose mothers had complicated pregnancies have higher rates of schizophrenia, but no one knew why this was. Could traumatic pregnancies somehow compromise the brain development of the fetus, causing schizophrenia? Or was it the reverse: Did something about the genes that cause schizophrenia also lead to adverse events in utero? Now, for the first time, scientists have evidence that serious pregnancy complications can activate certain schizophrenia genes. The findings have major implications for further research into how certain events in a woman’s pregnancy may change the way her child’s genes behave.   

The study, published earlier this week in Nature, describes how a team of researchers at the Lieber Institute for Brain Development in Baltimore looked at a population of 2,038 people with schizophrenia and 747 without the disease. They analyzed the participants’ genetic makeup, looking for the presence of certain genes that are associated with the disorder. Then, they cross-referenced the genetic findings with detailed medical histories of the participants’ mothers’ pregnancies, looking for serious complications like preeclampsia, growth restrictions, water breaking prematurely, and emergency cesarean sections. The team found that among people who carried the schizophrenia genes, rates of the actual disease were five times more common in those whose mothers had experienced pregnancy problems.

The researchers traced the connection to the placenta, the organ formed during pregnancy to carry oxygen and nutrients to the developing fetus. About a third of the genes associated with schizophrenia are found in the placenta, and people who carried those genes were especially likely to develop schizophrenia when there was a pregnancy complication. “We do believe this is fundamentally an environmental factor,” says psychiatrist Daniel Weinberger, a lead author on the study and the director and CEO of the Lieber Institute. “The more the placenta is inflamed, the more the schizophrenia genes get turned on.”

It’s important to note that even in the group that had both risk factors—schizophrenia genes and mothers with pregnancy problems—the overall rate of schizophrenia was still only about 15 percent, compared to less than 1 percent in the general population.

The findings raise interesting questions about the interplay between the uterine environment and gene expression. Weinberger points out that schizophrenia—as well as other brain disorders such as ADHD and autism—are more common in males. Researchers have observed for some time that male newborns are less resilient than females. “We think that male placentas may be more sensitive to environmental stress,” said Weinberger.

The research made me wonder about something else. In attempting to account for the high rates of pregnancy complications among African American women, high levels of stress linked to their experience of racism has been implicated as a possible factor. African Americans also have elevated rates of schizophrenia. So could the racism that contributes to black mothers’ difficult pregnancies also indirectly raise their offsprings’ risk for schizophrenia? It’s not an easy question to answer. Schizophrenia is a complicated disease, and many people believe that it has been overdiagnosed among African Americans. When I asked Weinberger about the possible connection, he acknowledged this “would be something to look at in the future.” 

I also ran that idea by Greg Miller, Northwestern University professor of psychology who has studied how stress affects African American mothers’ placentas. Miller emphasized that Weinberger’s study was outside his realm of expertise, but he calls the results “interesting and provocative.” He added, “Given the considerable racial disparities in perinatal complication rates, they could help explain why Blacks have higher risks of schizophrenia.”

But the broader implication of the new research, Weinberger said, is that it underscores the importance of placenta—which he describes as “the most neglected organ in the human body.” Another group in his lab is currently growing placentas from stem cells to try to figure out whether exposure to the stress hormone cortisol will make them less healthy. “When you think about all the possible ways that this organ could influence a person’s life,” he says, “it’s a new frontier.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate