Donald Trump’s Environmental Policies Will Actually Make Us Stupider

A new study bolsters the science linking air pollution to cognitive decline.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

More than 40 percent of Americans live in counties with unhealthy levels of air pollution, according to the American Lung Association. The health effects of inhaling contaminants such as ozone and particles from exhaust are well documented. The World Health Organization says air pollution causes about 1 in 9 deaths worldwide, mostly from lung and heart disease.

But pollution affects other parts of the body as well—researchers are increasingly linking exposure to diseases of the brain. The latest evidence is a large study, published this week, finding declining cognitive ability in people—especially the elderly—who breathe in pollutants regularly over time.

The researchers administered math and verbal tests to 250,000 people 10 and older from across China, once in 2010 and again in 2014. During that time, the researchers found, participants’ scores fell. After controlling for other variables, the researchers were able to connect those cognitive losses to pollution exposure. The declines were especially pronounced for older people, a finding that squares with this 2015 Mother Jones feature by Aaron Reuben about the connection between air pollution and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.

The mental declines could have significant societal impacts, lead author Xi Chen told me via email. “Damage on cognitive ability will affect earnings and health, and impede human capital from being an important engine of economic growth.”

The study noted that participants with less education tended to have greater declines in ability, possibly because they were more likely to work outdoors and thereby have more contact with polluted air. This squares with research conducted in the United States. Shakira Suglia, an Emory University epidemiologist who has studied air quality in disadvantaged communities, points out that polluted areas often lack amenities—like parks—that help protect against foul air.

In 2008, Suglia and her colleagues published a study linking cognitive problems in a group of Boston children to high pollution exposure. And communities with poor air pollution, she notes, tend to be unhealthy in other ways: less access to food, fewer recreation facilities, and more crime, for example. “It just kind of compounds everything,” she says.

Chen says his group’s findings underscore the need for strong regulations around air quality—which a recent analysis by University of California researchers found have been highly effective in the United States: “Public policies should respond to the increasing concerns on air pollution, in particular the hidden cost on intellect, which has not been well recognized before.”  

The news on that front, though, is grim. Earlier this month, President Trump announced plans to dramatically relax fuel efficiency standards, a move that would flood American communities with more dangerous airborne particulates from vehicles. Just last week, the Environmental Protection Agency determined that Trump’s new regulations for emissions at coal-burning power plants will cause an additional 1,400 deaths a year.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate