October 11, 2018

Maybe Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz Will Finally Talk About Climate Change

You’d think so, given Hurricane Michael just slammed his district. But…

Matt Gaetz and Donald TrumpTom Williams/Congressional Quarterly/Newscom via ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Hurricane Michael has torn through the Florida Panhandle with 155 miles per hour winds, leaving hundreds of thousands of people to deal with the wreckage of their flooded homes, towns, and beaches. 

With storm surges as high as 14 feet, it is one of the most powerful storm to have ever hit not only Florida, but the continental United States. Climate change is helping to fuel stronger and wetter hurricanes, as the warmer air can hold more moisture. Over the decades, worsening sea level rise will mean storm surges are several feet higher than anyone has seen. It’s almost as if the storm was ripped from the deadly future laid out in the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report out this week.

The Sunshine State has the rare distinction of being ground zero for Republican politicians who reject climate change, while also representing a place that faces some of the most severe threats from it. With roughly 1,200 miles of coastline, Florida is already in a daily battle with regular flooding at high tide as sea levels rise. 

Take Matt Gaetz, a freshman Republican, represents the reliably Republican 1st congressional just west of where Michael made landfall in the Florida Panhandle.  In many ways, he embodies the contradictions of Florida politics regarding climate change, where some Florida Republicans are ready to talk about climate change, while others equivocate on the clear science. 

On paper, Gaetz might seem to take climate change seriously. Recently, he did connect sea-level rise to climate change in a way most Republicans aren’t known to do, telling the The Gainesville Sun, “I see sea level rise as a consequence of climate change.” He acknowledged that while he didn’t agree with some views from either party “about the strategy to combat the problem, but I certainly can acknowledge that the earth is warming and humans make some contribution to that warming.” 

But then there’s his actual record. As with fellow Floridians Governor Rick Scott and Senator Marco Rubio, who tend to make excuses for not dealing substantively with the drastic effects of climate change in their state, there’s not much policy to back Gaetz’s words. For instance, he proposed a one-sentence bill abolishing the Environmental Protection Agency last year and has not backed a bill by his GOP colleague Carlos Curbelo of Miami for a carbon tax. 

Here’s what else is behind that record: 

Matt Gaetz, a freshman congressman from Florida, would like to abolish the Environmental Protection Agency. Known for attacking the FBI’s Russia probe and inviting a Holocaust denier to the State of the Union, the House Republican earlier last year introduced a one-sentence bill to terminate the EPA. He’s also heralded Trump’s “strong leadership” for the withdrawal of the US from the Paris climate agreement. So it came as a surprise in November when the House Climate Solutions Caucus welcomed him as a member.

Gaetz may have said two years ago that global warming could also be naturally caused, but when asked recently about his views, he explained, “I think history will judge very harshly those who are climate deniers.” Yet even now, having admitted humans play a significant role in climate change, he stops short of backing action that science shows is needed to contain the process. And that includes policies favored by some Republicans, like a revenue-neutral tax on carbon pollution, which he says “will merely export our pollution to other countries.”

While Gaetz gets credit for joining the symbolic Climate Solutions Caucus, the environmental group League of Conservation Voters has given him an abysmal 6 percent voting score on the environment.

In the end, his performance around Hurricane Michael illustrates shows where his greatest loyalties lie. Sandwiched between his praise for and from the president, the congressman has continued to tweet about the disaster affecting some 700,000 thousand constituents. In one of his first tweets after Michael struck, he retweeted the president: 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate