Getting Interior to Respond to Your FOIA Requests Just Got a Lot Harder

Ryan Zinke put an ex-Koch brothers’ adviser in charge of public records requests

Shawn Thew—Pool/Getty Images

In his latest attempt to make the Interior Department’s activities less transparent, Ryan Zinke shifted responsibility for handling public records requests from a career employee to a political appointee with a long history working for conservative megadonors Charles and David Koch. The order, signed November 20, was first noticed by the Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental advocacy group that has previously sued the Trump administration for not releasing information pertaining to its planned rollback of the Endangered Species Act. 

“Zinke is politicizing Interior’s Freedom of Information Act process to deny the public access to information and hide the oil industry’s dirty secrets,” Meg Townsend, the Center for Biological Diversity’s open government attorney, said in a statement. “With a Koch crony in charge of records requests, the department will work in darkness. Public records that might shame Zinke or big polluters will be covered up, and our public lands and wildlife will suffer.”

Instead of the department’s chief information officer fielding and responding to Freedom of Information Act requests—as has been the case previously—Zinke assigned the task to acting solicitor Daniel Jorjani, who had advised the Koch brothers in several roles, including as director of research at the Charles Koch Institute. Jorjani has been acting solicitor since President Trump’s inauguration, because the Senate has not confirmed a White House appointee as Interior’s main solicitor. (Trump nominated Ryan Nelson, now a judge on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, but his case never advanced in the Senate.)

Under Jorjani’s watch, the department released two legal opinions that have dramatically rolled back wildlife protections to the benefit of oil and gas firms, including an interpretation of the century-old Migratory Bird Act—designed to prevent the pursuit or capture of migratory birds—that prevents Interior from penalizing oil, gas, and solar companies that accidentally kill birds. The Obama administration had authored this opinion days before Trump took office, making it possible for energy operators to be held legally liable for accidentally harming birds. 

In recent months, Jorjani has developed a reputation as a “troubleshooter” who is willing to meet frequently with industry representatives who have business before the Interior Department. In the months before he issued his opinion on the Migratory Bird Act, Jorjani took “no fewer than two dozen” meetings with trade groups, industry lobbyists, and other officials, including several with an economic interest in gutting protections for migratory birds, according to emails and public records analyzed by Pacific Standard

Now that Jorjani is in charge of responding to public records requests submitted to Interior, advocacy groups believe he will further obstruct the process of obtaining public records from Zinke’s embattled department. Since May 2017, Interior has only fulfilled 10.53 percent of the FOIA requests submitted by the Western Values Project, a Montana-based environmental advocacy group. In partnership with two other groups, Democracy Forward and American Oversight, WVP sued Interior twice over outstanding FOIA requests related to deputy secretary David Bernhardt and whether Zinke complied with certain ethics rules. More than 130 public records requests, including some that are 18 months-old, “are still outstanding,” a spokesperson for the group said in an email to Mother Jones

Last December, Zinke drew headlines for adding a cloak of secrecy to another formerly apolitical process: the approval of federal grants. He ordered Steven Howke, a high school football teammate of Zinke’s with no prior government experience, to review any grant applications above a $50,000 threshold.  

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate