Washington’s Measles Outbreak Is a Wake-Up Call on Childhood Vaccination

“Unfortunately, this is an outbreak that we have prepared for.”

Pediatrician Dr. Amanda Porro prepares to administer a measles vaccination to Sophie Barquin, 4, as her mother holds her during a visit to the Miami Children's Hospital on January 28, 2015.

A pediatrician prepares to administer a measles vaccination.Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On January 25, after a measles outbreak sickened 31 people in the southwest corner of Washington state, Gov. Jay Inslee declared a state of emergency. All but one of the patients were children, most under the age of 10. Public health officials said they expected the number of cases to rise in the coming weeks. As of February 1, 43 cases had been confirmed across the state.

The outbreak recalled the 2014 measles epidemic that began at Disneyland in California, when at least 147 people were sickened. That incident spurred California lawmakers to pass more stringent vaccination requirements for children entering school. In Washington and Oregon, however, parents may enroll children who are not fully immunized against measles and other contagious, potentially deadly diseases. Low vaccination rates in the southwest Washington county where the current outbreak is centered and in the nearby Portland metropolitan area have exacerbated concerns that the outbreak could worsen in the coming weeks.

Before a vaccination program was introduced in 1963, the United States had between 3 and 4 million measles cases annually. Now, outbreaks are rare. That’s because of herd, or community, immunity: When enough people in an area are vaccinated against a disease, it loses its ability to spread. To stop a measles outbreak, “it may be that you need a vaccination coverage rate as high as 95 percent,” explains Matthew Daley, a pediatrician at Kaiser Permanente Colorado and a researcher specializing in vaccine-related issues. In Washington, he says, “the proof’s in the pudding, because if you have an outbreak, that means there’s not sufficient community immunity.”

Childhood vaccination rates in Washington are well below the 95 percent threshold for herd immunity. Across the state, only 90 percent of children entering kindergarten in 2017 had received the MMR vaccine that protects against measles, mumps, and rubella, down from almost 98 percent in 1998. Statewide, just 85 percent of kids met all of the school-entry immunization requirements for kindergartners, according to data collected by the state health department.

Unvaccinated Washington kindergarteners

But statewide vaccination coverage isn’t always an accurate predictor of whether an outbreak could occur. “What’s really important is what the immunization rates are in your community,” Daley says. “The people you’re going to see at the grocery store, at the mall, at school, at a sporting event—it’s their vaccination rate that matters for you.”

Measles is highly contagious. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 90 percent of unprotected people who come into contact with the virus will become infected. Measles spreads through coughing and sneezing, but you can contract it without having direct contact with an infected person because the virus lingers in the air for up to two hours. The telltale rash doesn’t usually appear for a week or two, giving infected people ample opportunity to spread the virus unawares.

Washington is one of 17 states that still allows vaccination exemptions for families who object to immunization for philosophical, moral, or other reasons. Children who are out of compliance with state immunization regulations may enroll in school if their parents file a form stating their objection to vaccination. As a result, local vaccination rates in the state vary widely. In Douglas County, nearly 97 percent of kindergartners are up to date on their vaccines. In San Juan County, just 47 percent are.

A majority of the measles cases in Washington have been in Clark County, in the state’s southwest corner. The county has one of the lowest vaccination rates in Washington: 76 percent of kindergartners were fully immunized in 2017, and 84 percent had received the MMR vaccine.

Zooming in closer, data from Clark County’s public and private schools exposes more pockets of spotty immunity. Of the 78 schools for which data is publicly available, 23 percent reported completed vaccination rates below 60 percent for incoming kindergartners. One elementary school with more than 100 students reported that just 41 percent of its kindergarteners were fully vaccinated. “If measles get into a school that has a 40 percent vaccination coverage rate, you’d expect the vast majority of those kids who are unvaccinated are going to get sick,” Daley says. “It’ll spread like wildfire.”

Vaccination rates for Washington kindergarteners


“Folks who choose not to vaccinate are taking advantage of those who do,” Daley says. Those who choose not to vaccinate rely on their immediate community to create the herd immunity that protects them. But during an outbreak, the unvaccinated are putting others who are unable to get the vaccine at risk. For children who are too young to get the vaccine, people with immune deficiencies, and those who are undergoing cancer treatment, getting measles can be deadly. “You could get exposed to measles just by going to the store,” Daley said. “It’s really not possible to protect yourself just by being careful of who you’re around.”

The last major measles epidemic in the United States occurred in 2014, when more than 140 people were infected in an outbreak that started at Disneyland in California. A spotlight was cast on the state’s school vaccination laws, which allowed parents to skip their children’s recommended immunizations by filing a personal belief exemption. As a result, pockets of unprotected children had formed across California.

The Disney epidemic propelled the state to pass a law that eliminated the personal belief exemption. Today, California schools can enroll a child only after reviewing their immunization records and determining that the student is fully vaccinated or has a valid medical exemption. In just two years, the New York Times reported, counties that once had the lowest immunization rates saw a 25 percent increase in vaccinations.

Now, Washington may follow California’s example. On the same day that Inslee declared a state of emergency, Washington lawmakers introduced a bill that would eliminate personal exemptions for the MMR vaccine. Previous attempts to revoke the state’s nonmedical exemption have faced stiff opposition from parents who have said that ≥such a measure would take away their rights to make decisions for their children.

Multnomah County, Oregon, home to the city of Portland, sits just south of Clark County, where the Washington outbreak is centered. So far, a single measles case has been declared in the county and remains the only confirmed incident in the state. Yet health officials are concerned that the virus could continue to spread across state lines. “We’ve been watching the outbreak closely because people do travel back and forth quite a bit,” says Jennifer Vines, a public health physician and the medical lead for outbreak response in Multnomah County.

Additionally, Multnomah County has particularly low vaccination rates. The county reports that only 66 percent of its two-year-olds were fully vaccinated in 2017. “We do know that we are below the herd immunity threshold,” Vines says. “Children who are not vaccinated often tend to go to the same school or be part of the same community.”

The county was also recently exposed as having one of the country’s highest rates of nonmedical vaccine exemptions. Researchers from the Baylor College of Medicine and the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development found that during the 2016-17 school year, more than 700 kindergartners in the county were unvaccinated for nonmedical reasons.

Given the county’s low vaccination rates, Vines says, health officials were “disappointed but not surprised” to confirm a case of measles. “As much as our responsibility is to promote vaccine uptake, and we’re still of course leading with that message, we’ve also honed our skills on how to respond to measles,” she said. “Unfortunately, this is an outbreak that we have prepared for.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate