The White House Denied Me Access to Trump’s Environmental Speech

“NOT Confirmed to Attend the Remarks on America’s Environmental Leadership.”

Al Drago/Pool/CNP via ZUMA

President Donald Trump will be delivering a speech on America’s environmental leadership on Monday afternoon, alongside EPA administrator Andrew Wheeler, in which he’s expected to tout how much he’s done for clean air and clean water. It’s an unusual subject for him to give a speech about—Axios called it a “Javanka Special”—given the many regulations his administration has ripped up in favor of industry lobbyists. His many environmental opponents have already pointed out how short the list of his environmental accomplishments really is.  

Naturally, as an environmental reporter who works a few blocks from the White House, I requested press credentials to cover his speech. After a few days of silence, I received a generic email from the White House Press Office yesterday at 6:40 p.m. The subject line announced, “NOT Confirmed to Attend the Remarks on America’s Environmental Leadership,” a statement repeated in red letters at the top of the email. “Unfortunately, due to high interest and space constraints we cannot confirm you for tomorrow’s event and you are not credentialed to attend.”  I asked for additional comment but have not yet received the response. 

I have covered the Trump administration’s environmental record closely from the beginning. Just like when I covered the Obama administration, sometimes my reporting proved embarrassing for the EPA. And the Trump administration has certainly demonstrated a pattern in how it handles press. 

In some ways, I suppose my getting shut out is not surprising, given that Mother Jones has been tough and critical in its coverage of the Trump administration. That’s our job. 

But one strategy of Trump’s lengthy history in attacking the press—alongside briefly revoking a White House reporter’s press passes and repeatedly demonizing journalists and the publications we work for—has been to simply deny entry.

My colleague Pema Levy wrote about Trump’s informal blacklist during the 2016 campaign. “It seems that once Trump and his team have decided someone is not on the list, their word is just about final,” she observed.

The official and now familiar reason the Trump campaign gave to Pema was that the event was “well over capacity,” even while letting other journalists enter. Several Mother Jones reporters were barred from covering his campaign events in early 2016, joining quite a long and distinguished list of reporters and outlets the campaign seemed to deem unfriendly—including HuffPost, Politico, BuzzFeed, National Review, the New York Times. Trump admitted to the media black list in June 2016, when he posted on Facebook he’d revoke the press credentials of the “phony and dishonest” Washington Post.

This approach extends to the government agencies that have traditionally been covered by journalists. His political appointees have followed his lead by sometimes shutting out the beat reporters from covering federal agencies. The EPA has done this repeatedly with environmental reporters, admitting to removing a Washington Post reporter from its press lists—which I mysteriously disappeared from as well—and physically ejecting an AP reporter who was covering a conference devoted to discussing water-polluting chemicals known as PFAS.

I will still cover Trump’s speech—and factcheck it—anyway.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate