These 5 Stats Show Just How Devastating California’s Wildfires Have Been—So Far

The financial damage is higher than the annual GDP of some countries.

The Bobcat Fire burns in the Angeles National Forest in Los Angeles, Monday, Sept. 21, 2020.Ringo Chiu/Zuma

In mid-August, the most destructive wildfire season in California history seemed to peak over a deadly 48-hour period. Between the evenings of August 16 and August 18, five of the 20 largest ever fires began to spread across the state. With the addition of the Creek Fire two weeks later, six record-breaking infernos were spreading simultaneously. At varying degrees of containment, they still are.

With the wildfire season only half over, it is difficult to tally all the damage. Last year, the fire season was one 26th the size 2020’s, and there are months left before this season ends. How is it possible to comprehend the difference between, say, 10,000 scorched acres and one million? To put this year’s wildfire season thus far into perspective, here are five stats to contextualize the damage.

Area Burned

This year, Cal Fire reports that about 3.6 million acres have burned. That’s equivalent 5,667 square miles. The 14 most-populated US cities combined—including New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston and Philadelphia—encompass 5,666 square miles and are home to more than 27 million people.

Fire Fuel

During a press conference earlier this month, Donald Trump revived a bizarre claim he made in 2018 about Europeans being better at preventing wildfires because they rake forest floors. On its own, the claim reflects a deep misunderstanding of wildfires, but plugged into a Trump-to-English translator, there might be something there. The president is a fan of more aggressive forest management, including clearing out dead trees that could fuel flames. In addition to—and because of—climate change, some California forests have seen massive tree die outs in recent years due to hungry bugs, leaving an excess of dry, flammable material. As Mother Jones reporter Jackie Flynn Mogensen recently noted, “The massive tree death during those years was primarily due to the 2012-2015 drought and decades of forest mismanagement that resulted in severe overcrowding…one other key factor was an extensive bark beetle infestation.”

As a result, the USDA estimates that more than 150 million trees died across the state in the last decade. This is particularly concerning in Sierra National Forest, where the Creek Fire is burning. So what does this mean? Officials estimate the die outs created 2,000 tons of fire fuel per acre there, which means that burnable material equivalent in weight to four fully-stocked Boeing 747 commercial jets sits on every acre of a plot of land the size of a large backyard. 

Smoke Emissions

The August ramp up of flames translated to an increase of smoke emissions into the atmosphere. On August 12, for example, before fires gained in intensity, there were 365 metric tons of smoke emitted across California, according to three researchers, Dr. Fangjun Li and Dr. Xiaoyang Zhang at South Dakota State University, and Shobha Kondragunta at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. In less than a month, on September 8 when fires were spreading rapidly, the daily emissions spiked to 1,057,348 metric tons. All told, the wildfire smoke emissions between August 12 and September 22 add up to about five million tons. To put that into perspective, an average gas powered car emits around 4.6 metric tons of carbon dioxide annually. Carbon dioxide and smoke particle emissions are distinct from each other, but in sheer mass, California’s wildfires released in six weeks what more than one million cars would release in a year, if each drove 11,500 miles in that period.

Air Quality

Recently, signs of the unusual fire season spread beyond the West with wildfire smoke coulding skies in the east coast. One smoke plume even streaked across the Atlantic Ocean, and appeared above the Netherlands.

Back in California and Oregon, air quality continued to worsen as toxins released from the fire, like particulate matter 2.5—a tiny, invisible but dangerous substance—spread throughout the air. Once inhaled, PM2.5 can cause lung inflammation, spark flare ups for those with preexisting lung conditions, and likely worsen COVID-19 symptoms. According to the Los Angeles Times, 95 percent of Californians were being exposed to bad air quality by mid-September. Between September 14 and 17, the top five worst ever air qualities readings in the state took place. At the top of the list was the September 15 reading for Mammoth Lake in the Sierra Nevada Mountains. At 660 micrograms of PM2.5 per cubic meter, the town was experiencing levels almost 20 times worse than the EPA’s maximum single day safe exposure of 35 micrograms.

Financial Cost

It’s impossible to predict how much financial damage this wildfire season will incur. With so much to tally, it’s doubtful the number will ever be certain. Some costs are clear: property destroyed, lives lost, work disrupted. But as the fire-caused disruptions ripple out across the lives of Californians, things become less defined. Calculating the costs of the lung damage caused across the state, for example, may be impossible. A Scripps Institute of Oceanography researcher, Tom Corringham, told the New York Times it “wouldn’t surprise me if the damages are over $20 billion this year.” How much is that equivalent to? Approximately one-third of the US film industry—or the entire economy of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate