How Do You Track a Murder Hornet?

Very carefully.

A real, live murder hornet.Rory Merry/Zuma

This piece was originally published in Slate and appears here as part of our Climate Desk Partnership.

On Saturday before dawn, entomologists launched their attack on a colony of snoozing murder hornets. Clad in cartoonish protective suits and brandishing a vacuum hose, they sucked 85 wasps alive from the nest and suffocated the rest with carbon dioxide and expanding foam. It’s the first time a nest of Asian giant hornets (as they are more correctly known) has been located and destroyed in the United States.

To find the elusive nest, researchers carried out some high-tech subterfuge. They captured a hornet, attached a tracking device, then followed the insect as she returned home. The signal led them to a nest tucked inside the crevice of a dead alder tree.

“We’ve now demonstrated that we can actively trap, track, find the nest, and take it out,” Sven-Erik Spichiger, an entomologist with the Washington State Department of Agriculture, said in a virtual press conference on Monday. “And that’s really what we need to be able to do to win the war overall.”

Native to Asia, the hornets first showed up in Washington and British Columbia late last year. The good news is that the 2-inch-long insects rarely attack people. It’s the hornets’ voracious appetite for bees that’s earned them the murderous moniker. They’ll eat just about any insect, but a bustling beehive “is like a supermarket, just an endless supply,” said the University of Exeter’s Peter Kennedy, who studies a similar wasp in Europe and has advised the WSDA. During the hornets’ horrifying-sounding slaughter phase, “a few Asian giant hornets can take out 30,000 healthy honeybees in just a matter of a few hours,” said Spichiger at a press conference on Oct. 23.

If the hornets gain a foothold in North America, researchers are worried that they will decimate honeybee populations and hamper their vital crop-pollinating work. To stamp out a hornet infestation, it’s crucial to destroy the nests and kill the queens, says Kennedy.

But getting to the nests in the first place is tricky, as the Washington state entomologists learned. The best bet to find a nest is to let a wasp lead the way with the help of a so-called Judas insect that betrays the location of its kin. To prepare a Judas wasp for its treacherous mission, the team captured the insect in a trap baited with a wasp-attracting cocktail of orange juice and rice wine. Next, they used dental floss to affix a miniature radio transmitter to its waist like a tiny belt. The wasp refueled with some strawberry jam, then headed for home—with the researchers in hot pursuit. The battery-powered transmitter sends out “chirps” on a radio frequency that are picked up by a handheld receiver tuned to that frequency, much like a car radio antenna. As the team zoned in on the wasp, the chirps got louder.

“It was getting very nerve-wracking as we got closer and closer. We were fully expecting them to be nesting in the ground and come boiling out like they do on YouTube and start stinging us,” said WSDA entomologist Chris Looney. “And then suddenly we realized that they were actually flying out [of a tree] right above [Spichiger’s] head. It was pretty exciting. I felt like I was in a movie, like a spy or something.”

The team’s successful espionage came after two failed attempts with a different tracker that sends a Bluetooth signal to a cellphone. Earlier this month, researchers attached the device to a wasp and followed it for a while, but soon lost track of the signal. “It actually flies a lot faster than we can run through 10-foot-high blackberry hedges, so it out-flew us,” Spichiger told NPR on Oct. 17. Bluetooth only works over a distance of a few hundred feet, whereas radio signals can travel much farther.

Radio technology has been used by biologists for decades to track mammals and birds with tags attached to collars, necklaces, and tiny backpacks. But it’s only recently that miniaturization of these devices has made tracking insects possible. Although the lightest tags weigh just 200 milligrams (about seven grains of uncooked rice), only chunky insects like hornets or large beetles can retain their aerodynamic prowess with such a cargo. “We’re working at the edge of what’s possible,” said Kennedy.

Matthew Siderhurst, professor of chemistry at Eastern Mennonite University, agrees. Attaching trackers is “quite a saga to figure out for different insects,” he said. His team pioneered the Judas insect technique on invasive coconut rhinoceros beetles in Guam. To track the beetles to their cryptic breeding sites, the researchers glued transmitters to their backs. After trial and error with super glue, dental adhesives, and hot glue, they settled on cool melt glue because it dried quickly and didn’t injure the beetles. “You don’t want to cook your insect while you’re putting on the tag,” he said.

When researchers in Europe tried to glue transmitters to yellow-legged hornets, close relatives of Asian giant hornets, it didn’t work. The insect became top-heavy, spinning around and dropping to the ground. “After watching quite a few hornets breakdancing on the floor, you realize this isn’t going to work,” said Kennedy. Inspired by images of helicopters carrying heavy loads, they ended up tying the tags to the wasps’ undersides with cotton thread. “They were able to readily fly with tags that would be up to 80 percent of their actual weight, which is quite impressive.”

WSDA researchers used a similar approach to affix trackers to Asian giant hornets with dental floss. “This worked out fairly well,” Spichiger said in the Oct. 23 press conference. “We did have one of the hornets get hold of the string and chew it off,” however, he added. “We may look at different kinds of string going into next year.”

Aside from seeking out pests to exterminate, researchers also track insects to learn about their movement and dispersal patterns. A different technology can work for insects that are too petite to carry a radio transmitter. Harmonic radar tags modify a radar signal emitted from a handheld device and reflect it back. Because the tags don’t use batteries, they can weigh as little as 3 mg (about one-tenth of a rice grain), and they’ve been used to track invasive spotted lanternfly and brown marmorated stink bug.

The Washington team believes there’s one or two more nests left in the area. But Spichiger said Monday, “We’re going to continue to look for those [nests] and just keep fighting these battles until we have eradicated Asian giant hornets—if that’s possible.”

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate