Solar Companies Ask Biden to Reverse Trump’s Biggest Blow to the Industry

“We are asking the president-elect to remove those tariffs a year early.”

A 2 megawatt DTE Energy solar installation built on formerly vacant land in Detroit, Michigan.Jim West/Zuma

This piece was originally published in HuffPost and appears here as part of our Climate Desk Partnership.

In January 2018, President Donald Trump slapped tariffs on imported solar panels despite protests from much of the industry, sending jobs in one of the nation’s fastest-growing employment engines tumbling for the following two years. 

Now the solar industry is asking President-elect Joe Biden to cut short what was widely seen as Trump’s biggest blow to solar energy during his single term. 

On Tuesday, Solar Energy Industries Association, a trade group representing more than 1,000 companies, said it wants the Biden administration to revoke the four-year tariffs a year early. 

The White House should have the legal authority to end the import fees unilaterally, despite the fact that courts blocked Trump’s efforts to amend his own tariffs to remove an exemption for bifacial panels, photovoltaics that harvest energy from the sun on both sides of the equipment.  

“Revoking an exclusion already granted and removing tariffs are two very different procedural policies,” Abigail Ross Hopper, SEIA’s president and chief executive, said during a press call Tuesday morning. 

“We are asking the president-elect to remove those tariffs a year early because we don’t think it was having the policy objective at least our current president was looking for,” she added. 

Trump enacted the 30 percent tariffs, which declined at a 5 percent rate per year, as an opening shot in what became a larger trade war with China by the end of 2018. On the face of it, his decision appeared aimed at giving the small US solar manufacturing sector a chance to compete against Asian rivals that enjoy lower labor costs and more generous government support. 

Yet more than two dozen US solar manufacturers publicly urged the Trump administration not to implement the tariffs. Instead, the White House sided with the subsidiaries of two foreign-owned solar companies that had requested the tariffs―Georgia-based Suniva, which was owned by a Chinese company, and SolarWorld, the Oregon-based division of a German panel manufacturer.

The effect of the tariffs was mixed. Roughly half a dozen companies set up new solar module plants in the US, but other factories closed, the trade publication GreenTechMedia reported. In an industry where three-quarters of Americans work in installation and wholesale―sectors bolstered by cheap imported panels―the tariffs forfeited 62,000 jobs and $19 billion in investment, according to an analysis SEIA released last December. 

“We have had numerous conversations with the transition team about this,” Hopper said of Biden officials. “It’s a thing we’ve raised and continue to raise with them because it’s been so impactful on our industry.” 

Other concerns included in the nine-page wish list SEIA released Tuesday include appointing renewable-friendly commissioners to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, increasing solar use at federal agencies and making it easier to permit solar projects on public lands. 

While the White House may have the authority to go it alone on those issues, the industry’s other top priority will require Congress. SEIA is hoping Congress will extend the solar investment tax credit, the federal incentive that has long fueled the industry’s growth. 

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), whose party looks likely to hold a narrow majority in the chamber next year, has signaled he won’t support including Democratic legislative priorities in the next stimulus bill to ward off a pandemic-induced economic depression. But Hopper said extending the solar tax credit would likely garner bipartisan support.

“In conversations that we have that aren’t on the front page of a newspaper, there are many, many Republican senators who support solar,” she said. 

Whether the tax credit is included in the stimulus bill, she said, depends on how broad the legislation will be. 

“We have some concern,” she said. “If something moves, we have a good chance of being in there, but there is obviously a pretty large divide as we sit here today on Nov. 17.” 

Either way, the industry looks set to boom in the next decade. Last month, the International Energy Agency declared solar “the new king of electricity,” projecting that in the years to come, it would produce the cheapest power the world has ever seen.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate