Tesla’s Autopilot Has Been Linked to Multiple Deaths. Here’s an Alternative.

If you want to play Candy Crush while getting from point A to point B, consider public transit.

I bet all that automobile wreckage is great for the environment.Patrick Fallon/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

So-called “self-driving” Teslas keep crashing. During a four-month period this year, 11 people died in vehicle crashes involving automated driving systems in the United States, according to new government data reported by the Associated Press. Ten of the wrecks involved Teslas. While it’s not definitive whether the technology itself was to blame, the crashes suggest that Elon Musk’s Autopilot technology is far from foolproof.

Luckily, there’s a simple solution: Take the bus. The best autopilot technology in the country is public transportation.

If you want to play Candy Crush while en route to your destination, consider a train. If you want to read an article while listening to an album, consider the unique experience of a trolly or a ferry. And if it bugs you that you cannot do any of these things—because you live in a country with depleted public transit infrastructure—that’s totally fair. Luckily, we can fix this issue without having to invent anything new. We just need to build.

Elon Musk would like you to think that you can turn on a Tesla, tune in, and drop out. In 2016, he claimed that Tesla’s autopilot system would drive “probably better than a person right now.” Last week, he touted a $15,000 “Full Self-Driving” software add-on, saying, “The car will be able to take you from your home to your work, your friend’s house, the grocery store without you touching the wheel.”

The language on Tesla’s website is more realistic. “Autopilot, Enhanced Autopilot and Full Self-Driving Capability are intended for use with a fully attentive driver, who has their hands on the wheel and is prepared to take over at any moment,” it says. “While these features are designed to become more capable over time, the currently enabled features do not make the vehicle autonomous.”

Anecdotally, though, plenty of Tesla drivers do take Autopilot as carte blanche to put their feet up. In 2018, an Apple engineer who appeared to be playing a video game on his phone died when his Tesla Model X hit a concrete barrier in California at 71 miles per hour. In 2019, a Tesla Model S operating on Autopilot crashed into a parked car and killed a 22-year-old woman after its operator leaned over to pick up the cellphone he had dropped. In 2020, a North Carolina driver was reportedly watching a movie on his phone when his Tesla crashed into a state trooper’s vehicle.

Multiple state and federal agencies are concerned. Yesterday, the Wall Street Journal reported that the Securities and Exchange Commission was conducting a civil investigation into Tesla executives’ statements about Autopilot’s safety. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice has launched a criminal investigation into Tesla’s claims about Autopilot, according to a Reuters report. And why not throw in a California Department of Motor Vehicles false advertising lawsuit for good measure?

When I told my friend this evening that I was working on a story about self-driving cars, she said, “It seems like that could only work if the cars were on some type of track.” She was onto something. About 4,000 years ago, humans started putting vehicles on tracks. We’ve gotten very good at it. Now, you can ride the subway in New York City, take a cable car in San Francisco, or zip across Japan on the Bullet Train with negligible odds of killing a pedestrian or dying in a fiery crash. During your commute, no one will fault you for bending over, playing a video game, or watching a movie on your phone—as long as you’re wearing headphones. The cheapest Tesla model will run you $46,990. A MetroCard is $2.75. As Malcolm Harris has argued, the bus can even fight inflation.

We should move toward a world where everyone can fall asleep on the way to work, with no bigger consequence than a little drool on a stranger’s shoulder.

And we don’t need a new version of autopilot to make that happen.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate