Rural Georgia Town Squares Off With Rail Company That Wants Its Land

“They didn’t expect us to push back because we’re poor and Black.”

Janet Smith of Sparta, Georgia, opposes plans for a new railway spur.Courtesy of Janet Smith

This story was originally published by the Guardian and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

A majority-Black rural community in Georgia is battling to stop a railroad company from seizing private land for a new train line they say will cause environmental and economic harms.

Residents of Sparta, a poor community of 1,300 people located 100 miles southeast of Atlanta, are opposing the construction of a rail spur that would connect a local quarry to the main train line, enabling the gravel company to vastly expand mining that already causes dust, debris, and noise pollution.

Residents, including direct descendants of James Blair Smith, the African American farmer who against all odds obtained and farmed the land almost a century ago, have so far resisted efforts by the company to convince landowners to sell portions of their properties needed for the project.

Now, fears are mounting that the Sandersville Railroad Company, which claims the project will generate a dozen well-paid jobs and boost the county economy by $1.5 million, could impose the 4.5-mile spur on the residents’ land, generating environmental hazards and depressing property values.

Last month, the company filed a petition with the Georgia Public Service Commission (PSC)—the first step to seize land by taking advantage of the state’s 19th-century eminent domain law. Eminent domain refers to the process by which the government or an authorized private entity may expropriate property for public benefit without the owner’s consent, but with compensation.

But a grassroots coalition of Black and white residents say they will not back down. “Our community is already like a dumping ground, so we’re going to fight this to the end—there is no compromise,” said Janet Smith, a retired school teacher and Army veteran who has organized petitions, letters, yard sign placements, and prayer rallies, and spearheads the “no railroad in our community” coalition.

“They didn’t expect us to push back because we’re poor and Black. But this property is all that we’ve got to leave to our sons—it’s the disrespect of it all,” added Smith, 64, whose husband is a fourth generation descendant of the original landowner.

Sparta is a rural town in Hancock county where 70 percent of the population is Black and almost one in three people live in poverty, according to census data.

Sparta’s Black history dates back to the Jim Crow era in the Deep South, when Blaine Smith managed to purchase 600 acres of land and started a company farming cotton, then peas, butter beans, and corn. He fended off efforts from white residents to take the land, which over the past century has been divided and passed down through generations, enabling his descendants to accumulate wealth to pass on to their children and grandchildren. Black households still face systematic barriers to building generational wealth, which fuels a large racial wealth gap, according to the Center for American Progress think tank.

Last year, residents—Black and white—started receiving letters from Sandersville, the railroad company owned by the politically influential Tarbutton family. The company wants to build a spur through Sparta to connect the Hanson quarry to the main rail tracks that run along a nearby state highway. Currently, the quarry relies on trucks to transport its gravel and sand, but the railway would enable thousands of additional tons to be moved every week, which means more blasts and dust and debris for nearby residents.

The train tracks would cut through eight properties, and run close to many other homes that mostly belong to retired Black families. The first petition filed at the PSC pertains to the land owned by David and Sally Garrett, a retired white couple opposed to the rail spur, which would split their property in half.

Sandersville says the proposed train would make one round trip a day while reducing truck traffic and therefore greenhouse gas emissions. “After surveying the land, the chosen route is the most efficient and least impactful route,” said Ben Tarbutton, owner of the Sandersville Railroad Company.

“While it is not our desire to use eminent domain, we are confident in our legal ability to utilize it if necessary…The project addresses a glaring need in our state, region and nation for affordable raw materials to meet the goals of President Biden’s bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. As the United States embarks on an historic effort to repair, rebuild and reinvest in critical roads and bridges, Hancock County has an opportunity to meaningfully benefit from those efforts,” Tarbutton said.

The company vehemently denies that the proposed route is linked to “race, color, creed, poverty level or any related factors.”

But residents and their legal advisers are skeptical about the promised benefits, while worrying about derailments and pollution. “This predominantly Black community obtained and maintained this land, building generational wealth for their families in the south against all odds,” said Jamie Rush, senior attorney for the Southern Poverty Law Center, which is advising the community. “The company claims it will provide public benefits but really it seems like a project to generate profits to the detriment of the Sparta residents.”

Smith added: “We have enough burdens. This is environmental injustice.”

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate