Tropical Storm Hilary’s Flood Risk Is “Genuinely Alarming”

It “has high potential to be a historic flood event.”

AP/NOAA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

For the first time in more than 80 years, Southern California is under a tropical storm watch as Hurricane Hilary heads towards the region. The storm will head north along Baja California, and is expected to hit the southwestern border of the US on Sunday afternoon or evening. The National Hurricane Center noted on Saturday morning that a “potentially historic amount of rainfall” could lead to flash flooding and landslides.

The flood risk in southeastern California deserts is “genuinely alarming,” tweeted Daniel Swain, a climate scientist at the University of California, Los Angeles, who studies extreme weather events. Swain wrote that the storm could bring 1-3 years’ worth of rain in 2-3 days to parts of the Southwest; “that means that life-threatening inundation of both low and high desert regions is likely, and that major damage/destruction of infrastructure—including major roads and highways—is possible in the hardest hit areas.” The National Weather Service warns that flooding is the deadliest hazard associated with tropical cyclones. 

This hurricane comes as the US has been experiencing record heat waves, and just weeks after wildfires devastated Maui. So it’s easy to wonder—is this historic storm another harbinger of what’s to come with climate change? Swain says maybe. There haven’t been formal studies, but one of the reasons hurricanes typically do not make landfall in California is cool ocean temperatures. As temperatures continue to rise, “oceans near California still won’t be warm enough to sustain tropical cyclogenesis…but they may allow storms with a favorable trajectory to weaken less quickly”—meaning that while these hurricanes “will most likely remain rare,” as the oceans warm it’s possible they will be stronger when they do arrive. 

Swain’s expert analysis can be found on his blog and YouTube livestreams as well as Twitter (now called X), at least for now. Reports of climate denialism on Twitter have been rising, some of which is directed at the scientists attempting to share educational, and potentially even life-saving information on the platform. Swain has not been immune: “the extreme volume of hate messages, personal threats, and climate denial [on Twitter] has become overwhelming in recent days,” he wrote on his blog, “and is now, for the first time, actively limiting my ability to use the platform as an effective tool.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate