Bureau Brews: Hook & Ladder

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.



Welcome to the first in an occasional series called “Bureau Brews” (Too nerdy? What about “Keg Stands?”) in which reporters and editors in Mother Jones‘ DC Bureau will do what we do best… drink beer. Really, it’s our birthright as journalists, and we take the responsibility quite seriously. (Read our hero Jack Schafer’s classic treatise on the subject here.) So, every once in a while, probably on Fridays after we’ve filed our stories for the week, we’ll break out the bottle opener and let you know what we think of various imported beers and their domestic craft cousins.

Our first victim is a local craft brewery called Hook & Ladder, based in Silver Spring, Maryland. (Disclaimer: I happen to know their PR guy. He’s a mensch.) The brewery was founded by two brothers—one a volunteer firefighter, the other an entrepreneur—who, in 1999, decided to combine their talents to open a craft brewery. They originally based it in the Bay Area, but the dot-com bust scared off investors, and the fledgling business fell on hard times. Since then, they’ve relocated to suburban Washington, DC, where, in 2005, they renewed their quest to quit the rat race and make beer for a living, this time with great success. As of October 2006, Hook & Ladder had only one distributor and was available only in the DC area; today, it’s got 73 distributors in 20 states, mostly along the East Coast, although for some reason it’s also available in Stockton, California, or so we’ve been told.

One thing to note before we proceed to reviewing the merchandise is that Hook & Ladder, true to its firefighter founders’ wishes, donates one penny from every pint sold to local burn centers. In the last two years, this has amounted to no less than $30,000. Could it be that drinking beer has finally become tax deductible? We’ll have to look into that…

Now for the beer. Hook & Ladder produces three: a low-cal beer called “Lighter,” a golden ale called, appropriately enough, “Golden Ale,” and…the brewery’s masterpiece, “Backdraft Brown.” It should be noted that, although we’re reporters and therefore have a certain knack for beer drinking, we are not professionally trained connoisseurs. So, we thought we might start by stating our biases in terms of favorite beers. Dan has a thing for Lone Star (“a Texas-style Bud,” he says); Jonathan is a fan of New Belgium Brewery’s Fat Tire, Nick prefers Newcastle Brown; and I tend to like most things Dogfish Head (except the IPAs, which I can’t stand). David Corn prefers rum, but we let him play anyway. (Laura and Stephanie were out today, but hopefully will join us next time.)

Without further ado… (note: for more serious criticism, click on the beer to be taken to ratebeer.com):

LIGHTER:
Not our favorite. Watery and thin. Definitely a low-cal brew. Appropriate for those paranoid about their waistlines, but not for us. We require a bit more flavor and, to put it bluntly, high-alcohol punch at the end of the week. (Now, it didn’t help that we sampled it from paper cups… which added the oh-so-gentle sweetness of industrial laminate. We’ll remember to bring beer glasses next time.)

GOLDEN ALE:
Better. Stronger. Pours with a thick, white head (again, partially the result of our paper cups). Creamy, smooth, with hints of honey. We’ll have to try this some more…

BACKDRAFT BROWN:
But not before we drink more Backdraft Brown. A big hit with us, and particularly with Nick for its similarity to Newcastle. Opaque brown in color with a thick, tan head the persists for a while. A nice balance of hops and malt, but more bitter than beers of similar styles. Hints of chocolate? Definitely worth sampling if you have the chance.

And that’s it: short and simple. This is, after all, just an excuse for us to drink in the office on a Friday, which, in our humble opinions, is as good a reason as any. We hope you’ll indulge us for future posts. Cheers.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate