Can Your Kid’s Cafeteria Now Opt out of “Pink Slime”?

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/speakingofhistory/4303730479/">Eric Langhorst</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Responding to a media storm (The Daily, CBS, ABC, me), the USDA has relented on “pink slime,” the ammonia-treated hamburger filler that the agency has been ushering into school-cafeteria burgers. “USDA will provide schools with a choice to order product either with or without Lean Finely Textured Beef,” the agency declared in a Thursday press release, using its preferred term for the product. .

So your kid’s school cafeteria can now opt out of the stuff starting now, right? Not so fast.

An excellent post by Nancy Huehnergarth of the New York State Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Alliance (NYSHEPA) blog raises some key questions about the USDA’s move. First of all, as Huehnergarth points out, the USDA’s announcement only applies to the food commodities the USDA itself buys for the National School Lunch Program, which amounts to about 20 percent of the ingredients that end up on kids’ plates.

The rest is sourced at the school-district level, and Ann Cooper, a veteran school lunch reform advocate and director of food services for the Boulder Valley School District in Colorado, told Huehnergarth that it’s doubtful that all schools that want to will be able to get hold of pink slime-free meat.

I talked to Cooper Friday morning to get her perspective. The USDA’s announcement is “smoke and mirrors,” Cooper told me. According to Cooper, most school districts have already pre-bought the entire school year’s food from vendors on contract—and it remains unclear whether district’s who have orders in for meat containing pink slime can change those orders.

And here’s the rub: pink slime’s maker, Beef Products International, has been so successful in getting its product into the industrial ground beef chain that there’s no easy way of getting it out. The company claimed several years ago that pink slime is mixed into 70 percent of the ground beef consumed in the country. That number has likely dropped since McDonalds and other fast food chains have stopped using it, but it remains deeply embedded in the production chain that creates cheap ground beef for supermarkets, schools, and other institutions.

Cooper told me that her district asked one of its suppliers for taco meat sans pink slime, and “they said, ‘we’re looking,'” Cooper told me. “If you can afford premium products like ground chuck, it’s not a problem,” Cooper explained. “But of you’re buying bulk commodity ground beef, like most school districts, it’s going to be really hard, and not always possible.”

Cooper added that opting out of pink slime may evolve into a luxury that only well-to-do school districts can afford, while districts in low-income areas may be stuck with it.

And even districts that can afford pure beef may still have trouble getting it processed without the controversial additive. Cooper explained that few districts have the staffing budgets to turn, say, bulk ground chuck into hamburger patties. To do that, they contract the patty-making out to processors. But they typically get no guarantee that the specific block of ground beef they send in will emerge as the patties they get back. The processors are typically free to mix meat inputs freely, which is much cheaper for them than custom-processing. So a districts buy of pure ground chuck could come back as patties with pink slime mixed in.

Speaking on background, a USDA spokesperson confirmed that the agency’s announcement applies only to beef procured directly by the agency. All of the rest is a matter decided between the individual districts and their private suppliers. So ensuring that your kid’s school lunch is slime-free is going to be much more complicated that the USDA’s press release made it sound.

It’s also worth noting that bulk ground meat isn’t just found in burgers. Cooper mentioned taco filling as another product that typically gets a lashing of it. Beef Product International’s web site lists more, many of which are lunchroom staples: hot dogs, lunch meats, chili, sausages, pepperoni, retail frozen entrees, roast beef, and canned foods.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate