Revolving Door: Romney Ag Team Edition

Image by Celine Nadeau.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


For the casual observer like me, it’s hard to make sense of the GOP presidential primary, what with all the crazy talk and the recurrent Santorum surges. But people who follow these things closely tell me that despite the chaos, Mitt Romney will likely emerge as the nominee.

That means it’s time to start contemplating what a hypothetical President Romney might get up to on food and agriculture issues. The embattled Republican front-runner hasn’t expressed his views on ag policy. But just last week, Romney telegraphed his food-and-ag agenda by announcing his Agriculture Advisory Committee.  

Surprise, surprise: Big Ag interests rule the roost. Here are some highlights.

• Randy Russell, president, the Russell Group. This was a bold move by Romney—Russell is a high-powered D.C. lobbyist whose firm boasts clients that rank among the biggest names in industrial food and agriculture. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the Russell group reaped more than $4 million in lobbying income in 2011. Top clients included Cargill, Monsanto, JBS (the globe’s largest meat company),  PepsiCo, Yum! Brands (owner of Taco Bell, KFC, and Pizza Hut), Kraft, Altria, Hormel, Land O’ Lakes, and the National Pork Producers Council.

Russell has made a career of dashing through the revolving door that separates agribusiness from the government agencies that regulate it (bio here)—he went from serving as Farm Bill coordinator for Reagan’s USDA in 1981 to heading up government relations for Pillsbury in 1982;  after that, he headed back to Reagan’s USDA in 1984—and promptly launched his lobbying career in 1986. Got all that?

On its website, the Russell Group takes credit for ramming Monsanto’s hotly contested Roundup Ready alfalfa crop through the USDA approval process in 2011.

Bill Even, North American Biotech Affairs and Industry Relations Leader at Dupont’s Pioneer Hi-Bred International. Curiously, the above-linked Romney campaign press release omitted Even’s current job in its description of him, listing him as co-owner of Even Family Farms and  South Dakota’s former Secretary of Agriculture. But Even departed his state ag secretary job in 2010 precisely to join Dupont’s high-tech seed division. According to a 2011 report from ETC Group, Dupont is the globe’s second-biggest seed company (trailing only Monsanto) and the sixth-largest seller of pesticides.

• Chuck Conner, President and CEO, National Council of Farmer Cooperatives (2009-present) and former deputy secretary, USDA (2005-2008). Again, the Romney press release has omitted the juiciest bit on on Conner’s résumé: from 1997 to 2001, Conner was president of the Corn Refiners Association, which represents the corn-ethanol and high-fructose corn syrup industries and the heavyweight corporations that dominate them, including Archer Daniels Midland and Cargill.

• Senator Mike Johanns, US Senator from Nebraska (2009-present). Johanns served as Bush’s secretary of agriculture (and Chuck Conner’s boss) from 2005 to 2007. He stepped down to successfully run for the Senate, and promptly became a magnet for agribusiness cash, drawing in a cool $522,000 from the industry since he first ran, the Center for Responsive Politics shows. He has not been shy about promoting their interests. In a 2011 letter to the House and Senate ag committee chairs, Johanns calls for hearings to investigate some of the very few progressive initiatives in the Obama administration’s farm policy, iincluding attempts to rein in the power of the meat industry, reduce pollution from factory livestock programs, and devote a tiny portion of the USDA’s budget to promote local and regional food production.

Other ag interests represented by Romney’s ag team include California’s large-scale fruit and vegetable growers (Western Growers CEO Tom Nassif), Florida’s citrus industry (Florida Department of Agriculture commissioner and citrus grower Adam Putnam), and Big Dairy (Land O’ Lakes CEO Chris Policinski).

By assembling a team that includes an exec from one of the globe’s largest agribiz firms, a powerful industry lobbyist, and a former corn-industry flack, Romney’s message is as subtle a giant combine roaring through a corn field: support my candidacy, and I’ll tend to your (agri)business.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate