Trump’s Decision Means She Has To Start “All Over Again”

How one DACA recipient is faring in rural Tennessee.

The town of Bells, Tenn.Yalonda M. James

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Last month, I wrote about how people of color in my rural Tennessee hometown are faring amid a political landscape that has largely focused on white people—the white working class, the rise of white supremacy, Trump’s largely white base. One former classmate I talked to, Elena Garcia, is the beneficiary an Obama-era policy called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals that granted a renewable two-year work permit to some young undocumented immigrants. Her parents, however, still don’t have papers:

Garcia’s parents are undocumented, and she wrestles with the fear they will be deported. If that were to happen, Garcia could not travel to see them—DACA does not allow for travel outside the United States. She’s not eligible for a passport.

“We haven’t been [to Mexico] in years and I don’t know what my parents would do there with people they don’t know anymore,” she said. “Me being such an attached person to my family, girl, I would cry rivers.”

Then, not long after my story was published, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that President Trump would officially rescind DACA. So I called Garcia (whose name I’ve changed to protect her privacy) to hear how she’s been dealing with the news. You can hear part of my conversation with her in this week’s episode of Bite podcast:

“The only thing we know is what we heard on Tuesday, that we’ve got six months, and whenever these six months end, I don’t know,” she told me. “We’re just praying to see what’s going to happen, because we have no idea.”

She has felt that way before. In 2009, when we graduated high school, I remember chatting with my classmates about our new paths forward—into new schools and new jobs. But Garcia remained quiet and vague about her future plans.

“I never felt any different from anyone from here,” Garcia remembers. “But when we graduated…that’s when it all hit that I couldn’t do the same thing as all of y’all—I had no social [security number], I wasn’t legal, so I was limited.”

Without a social security number, Garcia also couldn’t get a driver’s license, so she missed out on another high school milestone. 

“I was always with that fear that they would get me, on the way to work, on the way to church, anything,”  she said.

In 2012, President Obama announced DACA, which recognized Garcia, who came to America when she was nine, as a person who had a right to work and reside in the country she knew as home. The day she got her permit—after paying the $500 fee—”felt like freedom,” she told me. 

Fast forward to a few weeks ago, when, just after Labor Day, Jeff Sessions announced the end of DACA. Garcia was devastated. She has a driver’s license and a stable job in quality control at a local frozen vegetable factory. (The food sector employs more DACA recipients than any other industry.) She’s working hard to save money for college, pulling five or six 10.5-hour shifts each week at $11.30 per hour.

Right after Sessions’ announcement, she was processing the news with a coworker, when some non-Hispanic coworkers interrupted with familiar comments. They accused DACA recipients of unfairly taking resources—like food stamps and college tuition discounts—away from American citizens. 

“Even after all this time…people still think that we’re taking stuff from them,” she says. 

Garcia and her coworker explained that this couldn’t be further from the truth. If they do choose to go to college, they’ll have to pay it all out of pocket at out-of-state costs. Each time they renew their permits, every two years, it costs $500. They’re not eligible for food stamps unless they have a child. They pay taxes, just like everyone else—in fact, on average, they pay more in taxes over their lifetimes than they receive in benefits.

 Just days before the official announcement that DACA would be discontinued, Garcia’s aunt was granted residency. Her family went from full celebration mode to watching the news in tears.

“We don’t know what to think, we don’t know what to feel, we don’t know what to do because we don’t even know if they could eventually deport us,” she says. “We’re starting all over again.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate