The Trump Administration’s Surprising Decision About Ultra High-Speed Chicken Slaughter

Poultry workers can breathe easier.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

It takes around 250,000 workers to break down chicken carcasses into the wings, drumsticks, thighs, and breasts that make up America’s favorite meat. These workers don’t have many friends in high places—the job is tough (birds whiz down the line at rates as high as two per second) and dangerous, and the pay stinks (about $11 per hour). Given these conditions, it’s not surprising that the industry attracts some of society’s most vulnerable people: immigrants, refugees, and even prisoners.

And yet, US poultry workers just got a surprise break from an unlikely quarter: the Trump administration. Last September, the National Chicken Council petitioned the US Department of Agriculture to allow poultry plants to operate their lines as fast as they want, as opposed to the current maximum of 140 birds per minute. Given the Trump team’s deregulatory zeal, its open hostility to the immigrants and refugees who tend to work those lines, and the fact that USDA secretary Sonny Perdue hails from the poultry-intensive state of Georgia, many observers thought the industry’s wish would be granted. Also, less than two weeks ago, the USDA announced a new inspection system for pork slaughterhouses that will likely result in a speed-up of the kill line for that industry. 

But in a Tuesday missive, the USDA flatly rejected the National Chicken Council’s petition. The reason involves food safety: The agency declared that the NCC had failed to provide data showing that “inspectors can conduct an effective carcass-by-carcass inspection” at lines speeds greater than the current minimum. 

The agency did place a subtle gift to the industry within the larger defeat. Currently, under an old pilot program, 20 chicken slaughterhouses are allowed to run lines as fast as 175 birds per minute—a 25 percent jump over the broad limit of 140 birds per minute, and the source of much outrage among worker advocacy groups. In its letter to the NCC, the agency announced it would expand the pilot program to include a “limited number” of additional plants to operate at the 175 birds per minute maximum. 

Even so, worker-advocacy groups see the USDA’s decision as a net victory. “The USDA’s decision to reject the poultry industry’s request to remove all line speed limits is an important victory for poultry workers in this current climate of deregulation and corporate welfare,” Sarah Rich, staff attorney at the Southern Poverty Law Center, said in an emailed statement. 

Minor Sinclair, director of Oxfam’s US Domestic Program, added that “while we welcome this victory for the workers across the country, we also sound a note of caution about the potential for individual plants to ask to raise the speed in their operations…Workers report that they’re already working at breakneck speed–slicing and cutting 40 or 50 birds per minute. They’re exhausted and hurting, and they worry about the problems they see in the food supply.”

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate