Painful Peeing? Raw Chicken Could Be to Blame

A new study says a strain of E. coli “could be causing 30,000 to 40,000” urinary tract infections in the United States every year.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

When you think about food poisoning, your mind probably turns to stomachaches and other digestive troubles. But there’s mounting evidence that bacterial pathogens, particularly some strains of E. coli commonly carried on poultry, can also cause a common ailment we don’t normally associate with dinner: urinary tract infections. 

A new study, led by Professor Lance Price of the George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, pinpoints a particular E. coli strain that’s adapted to thrive in chickens and also turns up in people with UTIs. For the study, the team took samples of chicken, turkey, and pork from Flagstaff, Arizona, supermarkets every two weeks for an entire year. Over the same time period, they analyzed urine and blood isolates taken from Flagstaff’s main hospital. They found E. coli on about 80 percent of the meat samples and in 72 percent of the urine and blood samples. 

Then the researchers analyzed the genomes of the E. coli cells to see if they could find genetic matches between the bacteria on the meat and in patients. The strains on pork were not related to ones found in people. But one particular strain turned up both ubiquitously on poultry and to a lesser extent in patients’ samples. That strain, called E. coli ST131-H22, is what the researchers call “avian associated”—that is, it has genes adapted to help it thrive in birds. 

The strain caused just 0.5 percent of the UTIs identified in the study, Price told me. But “if you scale that to the national estimates, ST131-H22 could be causing 30,000 to 40,000 UTIs in the US each year,” he said. And, he added, “this is just one of many E. coli strains present in our food supply”—some of those other strains could be triggering UTIs, too. 

Previous research on poultry and UTIs suggested but didn’t definitively establish an E. coli strain with a bird-specific genetic signature. “The most important message from this paper is that it establishes the direction of transmission from poultry to people, and it shows that poultry-adapted strains are capable of causing bladder and kidney infections in people,” Price said. 

I asked Price how E. coli from supermarket chicken could cause urinary infections. He explained that, as with any other bacteria, E. coli ST131-H22 doesn’t survive proper cooking. But as I noted in a recent piece on salmonella, cross-contamination—say, failing to wash a knife or even your hands properly after contact with raw chicken, a common kitchen blunder—is a way for germs to move from your meat into your mouth. The ST131-H22 strain is harmless to the digestive tract, Price explained, so it doesn’t trigger what we normally think of as food poisoning. 

But when it gets into the urinary tract—which for anatomical reasons happens much more frequently with women than with men—it can cause infections. 

Meanwhile, UTIs are getting harder to treat as E. coli strains evolve to resist antibiotics. Price told me the poultry-adapted ST131-H22 strain identified in the study was more likely to be resistant to tetracycline—an antibiotic used in human medicine and some chicken production—than non-poultry-adapted strains. Luckily, that’s not a huge concern, he said, because tetracycline isn’t among the antibiotics commonly used to treat UTIs. 

And the US poultry industry has begun to phase out routine use of antibiotics used in human medicine. Other regions still employ the same kind of antibiotic-intensive production that the US industry used to. “When my colleagues look at poultry E. coli in Southeast Asia, where they use all kind of antibiotics in livestock production, they see much scarier resistance profiles,” Price said. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate