The NFL’s Unspoken Obesity Problem

After being paid to bulk up, some football players struggle to stay healthy.

Indianapolis Colts quarterback Jared Lorenzen (13) is tackled in 2008. After retiring from football, Lorenzen weighed 500 pounds at one point. AJ Mast/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Tommy Tomlinson, a longtime columnist for the Charlotte Observer, didn’t think he’d have the courage to write a memoir about living as an overweight man. But that changed when he met Jared Lorenzen, a towering former University of Kentucky quarterback turned pro nicknamed the “Hefty Lefty,” at his home in Lexington, Kentucky, in 2014. Tomlinson was there to talk “fat guy to fat guy” for a story for ESPN the Magazine. “Jared Lorenzen and I are in love with the same woman,” Tomlinson later wrote. “Her name is Little Debbie, and she makes delicious snack cakes.” 

Both journalist and subject had gained hundreds of extra pounds—Tomlinson at one point weighed 460. The reasons for that were complicated, he realized. “We were both fairly active people—he much more than me, but both fairly active,” Tomlinson says on the new episode of the Bite podcast. “His weight was also tied up in his emotions, his feelings of love and affection and loneliness, and all those sorts of things.”

For most of his career, Lorenzen had struggled to keep his weight under control, worrying his family and friends. But as one of his coaches once told his father, “I don’t care what he weighs—as long as he can throw the ball.” After a storied college career, Lorenzen made it to the NFL, and in 2007 he earned a Super Bowl ring as a backup to New York Giants quarterback Eli Manning. He later played in a professional indoor league before his career ended with a brutal leg injury. After retiring, he suffered from congestive heart failure and, at one point, weighed more than 500 pounds. When ESPN’s E60 caught up with Lorenzen last July, the former quarterback had made it his mission to document his journey to lose weight on Facebook.

When it comes to football players’ health woes, we’re used to hearing about the toll of repeated concussions. But the industry is also grappling with an obesity scourge, as the New York Times recently reported. After years of being told to bulk up for their jobs, some retired players—especially linemen—don’t have the tools to shed that bulk once they’re off the field, which can lead to obesity along with heart conditions and sleep apnea. 

Tomlinson nearly played the game himself. A high school coach spotted him during his junior year and told him, “We could’ve made you into a football player.” So it makes sense that of all the stories he encountered in his career as a journalist, “Jared’s lives with me more than most,” he writes in his new memoir, The Elephant in the Room: One Fat Man’s Quest to Get Smaller in a Growing America. “It made me feel like not only was I not alone in those feelings but that my story might be worth telling.”

The Elephant in the Room takes an unflinching look at the many complex factors that led Tomlinson to put on extra pounds, from his emotional state—”I came to really rely on food to bring me comfort and solace when I was having tough times; it was kind of a friend in a way”—to the addictive quality of the hamburgers he came to adore—he became such a regular at Wendy’s, “they know me when I show up,” he admits. “That’s not what you want to be at a fast food place.”  

Even though his quest to lose weight is not without hiccups, Tomlinson’s sense of self-worth has improved by the end of the journey. “I felt like for a long time that it wasn’t worth trying to get better—that I was just going to live my life as the fat guy until my weight caused me some problem that would just cause me to keel over and be gone,” he says. “I don’t feel that way anymore.”

Listen to the full interview on Bite to hear Tomlinson’s thoughts on what people get wrong about obesity and how he’s learned to temper “the little boy inside of him” who always wants to eat.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate