It’s Put Up or Shut Up Time for Silicon Valley’s Fake-Meat Startups

Two venture capital-lavished food companies are about to see how they play on Wall Street and Main Street.

LauriPatterson/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

UPDATE (5/2/2019): Apparently, stock market investors love fake meat as much as their venture capital peers do. Beyond Meat’s share price surged a startling 163 percent after its initial public offering Thursday morning. That jump marks the “best debut session of any US listing since at least 2008 among IPOs that raised at least $200 million,” reports Bloomberg. Its valuation reached $3.8 billion.  

The push to disrupt the $270 billion US meat industry with legume-based analogues kicked into overdrive this week.

Los Angeles–based company Beyond Meat—originally funded by Bill Gates, two Twitter co-founders, and venture capital giant Kleiner Perkins—is taking its stock public as early as Thursday, hoping to raise $241 million in its initial public offering. If shares reach Beyond’s price target of $25, the faux-meat maker will be worth a cool $1.5 billion, Bloomberg reports. That would be quite a valuation for a company that lost $29.9 million last year on revenues of just $87.9 million, as reported in its prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  

Not to be overshadowed by a splashy IPO, its rival, Silicon Valley–based Impossible Foods—originally funded by Gates, Google Ventures, and VC giant Khosla Ventures—announced that fast-food giant Burger King would trial meatless Impossible Whoppers at all of its 7,300 nationwide outlets by year’s end, after an apparently successful test run in St. Louis starting April 1.

To top it off, Impossible was the topic of media stories heralding a phenomenon that any food startup would yearn for: a shortage based on surging demand. On Monday, Eater warned of a shortfall of Impossible Burgers in New York City. No doubt to the delight of Impossible management, the article quotes the manager of one small New York chain that switched to Beyond Meat’s burger product to ride out the Impossible shortfall. “A number of people” came in specifically for an Impossible Burger, the manager told Eater. “When informed of the Beyond Meat replacement, they turned around and left.” Ouch. 

And in a Wednesday CNN report, an Impossible exec said demand for the burger in the 7,000 restaurants it currently supplies has more than doubled, though he didn’t give a time frame. The company is “not sparing any expense” to keep up with demand, the exec told CNN, adding—shoutout to VC investors—”we absolutely will continue fundraising” to increase its capacity. 

Taken together, Beyond’s IPO and Impossible’s Burger King big week spell a turning point for an idea that has been nurtured by years of media and early-stage investor love: Vegetarian staples like peas and soybeans can be tweaked to precisely mimic meat, using just a dash of technology (in the case of Impossible, genetic engineering). 

But unlike journalists and VC visionaries, stock market investors and Burger King customers won’t necessarily be wooed by celebrity chef testimonials or claims of environmental sustainability. Wall Street will demand that Beyond Meat scale up fast and (eventually) turn a profit. That could be difficult. In its IPO prospectus—by law a brutally honest document, where companies spell out risks to potential investors—Beyond Meat states: “We incur significant expenses in developing our innovative products, building out our manufacturing facilities, obtaining and storing ingredients and other products and marketing the products we offer.” As a result, “we may not be able to achieve or sustain profitability, and we may incur significant losses for the foreseeable future.” 

As for Impossible’s Burger King deal, it’s good to remember that mega fast-food chains roll out and drop new products all the time, in an endless quest for the next blockbuster. Even as it plans to offer Impossible Whoppers nationwide in the coming months, BK is also betting that its core fans will continue gobbling up animal products. Its current new menu items includes the Angry Whopper (a bacon cheeseburger goosed with jalapeños and onion rings) and Bacon Cheesy Tots

Other, much smaller chains like Carl’s Jr. and White Castle have successfully added Beyond and Impossible burger analogues to their menus, respectively. The nationwide Burger King deal will be a test of whether these upstart vegetable-protein purveyors can supply mega-chains in a way that both entices their meat-eating clientele and delivers the goods for investors—who will soon be hungry for profit. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate