Your Organic Meat Might Not Actually Be Organic

Thanks to foreign fraudsters.

Tiago Galo

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

If you’ve ever bought organic meat, you’ve noticed the hefty price tag: An organic chicken can cost more than twice a conventional one. For some shoppers, that upcharge is worth it—the circular green and white “USDA Organic” label guarantees that the meat comes from an animal raised on feed that’s grown without pesticides or chemical fertilizers.

Or does it? Organic meat producers operate on impossibly tight margins, so many buy less expensive imported grain to feed their animals—and that’s where things get murky. Lax federal control means that exporters can hire organic certifiers that will help them boost profits by looking the other way. The result is an influx of cheap, fraudulent products that are driving down prices and hurting American organic farmers who play by the rules.

In an industry where organic labels can increase the value of a ship’s cargo by millions of dollars, the incentives for cutting corners are strong. Take Tiryaki, a billion-dollar Turkish exporter that handled 85 percent of the foreign organic grain that entered the United States in the first half of 2018. Early that year, the USDA caught a Tiryaki subsidiary attempting to import grain that allegedly “violated organic regulations.” That shipment was certified organic by Ecocert, a European certifier that had been forced to address red flags in previous audits, like using an agent without “sufficient expertise in organic production or handling techniques.”

The USDA didn’t penalize Tiryaki, and settled with Ecocert after it took corrective measures and paid a mere $5,000 fine. The following year, shipping records show, more than 153,000 tons of supposedly organic grain from Tiryaki showed up in US markets—double the previous year.

That kind of increase is cause for alarm, says John Bobbe, former executive director of OFARM, a co-op representing growers. “You don’t have organic production come up that fast.” Such big influxes hurt domestic producers who are subject to tighter regulations. From 2015 to 2017, the high volume of imports slashed organic corn prices from $13 to $8.20 a bushel. Organic soybean prices plunged from $26 to $17 a bushel, causing American organic grain farmers to lose more than $400 million in sales. Bob Stuczynski, a farmer in Amherst, Wisconsin, fears his family will lose their land if this trend continues. “The next generation won’t have a chance to farm,” he says of his three kids.

We import 70 percent of our organic soybeans and 40 percent of our organic corn, which are fed to organic livestock. The Cornucopia Institute, an industry watchdog group, suspects that the USDA, which is supposed to regulate but also promote US agriculture, is not strictly monitoring these imports—because if it did, it could undercut the entire organic food chain. “If the feed isn’t authentically organic, neither is the livestock, and neither is the meat on the table,” Anne Ross, a farm policy analyst with Cornucopia, writes in an email.

Other countries have cracked down on dodgy certification. The European Union requires pesticide testing on products from countries where organic fraud is rampant. Several third-party certifiers have lost their licenses in Europe and Canada for slapping organic labels on pesticide-laden food. Last March, Control Union, a massive certification business that works in more than 70 countries, lost its European license to approve organic products from Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russia, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates.

But American officials are taking a less stringent approach. They still do not require rigorous pesticide tests for organic imports from high-risk countries. Although the USDA suspended Control Union’s license to certify products from Turkey, the department still allows the company to accredit organic operations in Russia, Ukraine, and Bulgaria. Cargo ships continue to haul supposedly organic grain from the Black Sea into American ports, and in larger quantities than before.

Dave Chapman, executive director of a watchdog group called the Real Organic Project, worries that if word gets out about these fraudulent practices, consumers may soon stop trusting the word “organic” entirely. “A great deal of the organic label is trustworthy, and a great deal isn’t,” he says. “It’s going to kill organic if we don’t reclaim it.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate